Pls fix this kind of matchmaking (bombers galore)

[Guest]

This happend to me 20 minutes ago, guess who won.

[VN_HungNguyen 1,782]

You was also in a bomber, you know?

[Guest]

You was also in a bomber, you know?

So ?I have nothing against bomber players, I'm trying to unlock bombs so I can go and play tank rb. They need to put limit to bombers per game.

[Rebster86 51]

So ?I have nothing against bomber players, I'm trying to unlock bombs so I can go and play tank rb. They need to put limit to bombers per game.

Unfortunately this is something that has been going on for a long time. Most of the time its the same for every team, at higher tiers its the B17 spam that everyone hates and most of those matches are 50/50 on who wins. I love my bombers but i can stand all the negativity toward me when i fly any of them.

[MoldyThesaurus 680]

Well if you were playing Simulator Battles, everyone would be complaining!

[Sunleader 5,877]

True *gg*

But lets face it. SB Community is pretty whiny anyways xD  (Ducks and Runs for Cover)

 

 

And well.

I can understand the OP here.

I am Absolutely Favoring Bombers in General. And I dislike it that the Game is not a very good Place for Bombers Currently.

But Matches like this were one side is pretty much only Bombers. Are not Cool.

(Neither are Matches with only Fighters)

 

 

Thats why I would actually Embrace the Idea of having an Forced Ratio.

Like ok each Team has 4-6 Bombers in each Match.

 

That would make sure that both Sides actually got Bombers to do the Objective.

And would also prevent the Cases were a Team has so many Bombers that their Air Fighting Capacity is completely out the Window.

[warrior412 14,723]

Matchmaking does need tweaking, as too many bombers can strain teams more than they help them. Still, good usage of bombers can result in successes, even if only partly through bombing:

 

[spoiler]

 

 

Soviet P-40, I-153 M-62, MiG-3-34 and IL-4 plus the bridge, some tanks and AAA trucks. For the teamcarry. :3

[/spoiler]