Begleitpanzer 57 / German (1977)

[Ruslan_DR 686]

On 12/4/2016 at 1:13 PM, WulfPack said:

Is there any left or were they all scraped? 

 

I actually have no idea. I mean, would have to find out where AW got their documents.

[WulfPack 1,693]

37 minutes ago, Ruslan_DR said:

 

I actually have no idea. I mean, would have to find out where AW got their documents.

Probably the German government.

[Results45 2,200]

Nice segaway back to Germany there, WulPack ;•)

 

Meanwhile, I've changed mind about where I'd like the Begleitpanzer to be in the tree:

.

[dotEXCEL 5,969]

+1

[Ruslan_DR 686]

Huh, so apparently this is a fire support vehicle and not a light tank, still, could fulfill that role easily.

[Talks 452]

whats the turret rotation speed on this?

object 906 was sent to devs within 3 months with only 3 pages of discussion when is this going to be sent to devs for review?

[Dalles 56]

+1

[brunoorc00 3]

+1

[PzDiv_Nishizumi 25]

+1, After JPz 4-5 would be a nice place for it

[Results45 2,200]

2 hours ago, PzDiv_Nishizumi said:

+1, After JPz 4-5 would be a nice place for it

 

or the RkJpz. 2 HOT in the light tank/SPG line  

[PzDiv_Nishizumi 25]

17 hours ago, Results45 said:

 

or the RkJpz. 2 HOT in the light tank/SPG line  

Ah, that would be great too... I forgot that this tank have a TOW Missile

[Talks 452]

no, 7.0 to 7.3 that the correct place for this, the missile are probably MCLOS

I don't understand this "after jpz 4-5/rakjpz 2"

Edited January 14, 2017 by Talks

[WulfPack 1,693]

3 hours ago, Talks said:

no, 7.0 to 7.3 that the correct place for this, the missile are probably MACLOS

I don't understand this "after jpz 4-5/rakjpz 2"

Was there ever a MCLOS TOW? 

Edited January 14, 2017 by WulfPack

[Retry 7,363]

I have no idea where he gathered MCLOS (Manual Command Line-Of-Sight, not MACLOS), as both the HOT and TOW missiles are SACLOS.

[Talks 452]

so where is a turreted light tank 7.0 to 7.3? shouldn't even be added if its not taking that place.

RU 251 has been rotting in the passed to developers section which even if they add to game will go to 7.7 because everyone whining about a jpz 4-5 with turret shouldn't be at 7.0-7.3. they are adding a 15 cm lol gun to German tree instead of more important vehicles

[Nope 10,634]

4 hours ago, Talks said:

no, 7.0 to 7.3 that the correct place for this, the missile are probably MCLOS

I don't understand this "after jpz 4-5/rakjpz 2"

 

>TOW

>MCLOS

 

wat

[Results45 2,200]

6 hours ago, Talks said:

I don't understand this "after jpz 4-5/rakjpz 2"

 

We're debating whether to put the Begleitpanzer 57 in the TD line or the Light Tank/SPG line.

 

2 hours ago, Talks said:

so where is a turreted light tank 7.0 to 7.3? shouldn't even be added if its not taking that place.

 

RU 251 has been rotting in the passed to developers section which even if they add to game will go to 7.7 because everyone whining about a jpz 4-5 with turret shouldn't be at 7.0-7.3. they are adding a 15 cm lol gun to German tree instead of more important vehicles

 

Remember this?

 

On 12/19/2016 at 10:00 AM, Results45 said:

If you ask me, all of them should be added.

• Premium M41A3 (6.0)
• Spahpanzer SPIC 75 (6.3)
• Spahpanzer SPIC 90 (6.7)
• HS-30 (6.5 or 6.7)
• RU 251 (7.0)
• TAM/TH301 (8.0/8.3)
• Begleitpanzer 57 (8.3 or 8.5)

.

[Talks 452]

16 hours ago, Results45 said:

• Premium M41A3 (6.0)
• Spahpanzer SPIC 75 (6.3)
• Spahpanzer SPIC 90 (6.7)
• HS-30 (6.5 or 6.7)
• RU 251 (7.0)
• TAM/TH301 (8.0/8.3)
• Begleitpanzer 57 (8.3 or 8.5)

 

just because you agreed i should just assume everyone will agree too? not everyone but most people here have their favorite nation, people where complaining about the type 62 even before getting HEATFS that it was somehow "OP"

[Rohrkrepiererer 1,393]

I don't get why people would even want to make one nation more powerful than another. I like a challange, and moreover, a balanced game.

[Results45 2,200]

7 hours ago, Talks said:

 

just because you agreed i should just assume everyone will agree too? not everyone but most people here have their favorite nation, people where complaining about the type 62 even before getting HEATFS that it was somehow "OP"

 

Yeah I'm familiar with the legendary age-old issue of Russian Bias (not to mention having to waste twice as much of your life to grind for them).

 

I personally have no particular favorite when it comes to tank factions so much as I can ambush and blast opponents to shreds and study them all day  

[Packal 7,644]

Any news? I would like to get this hybrid of the ZSU-57 and IT-1, want want want it....

[_EQUAI_ 356]

I can already see this thing coming soon since the RU 251 is coming

[Ryan_King 907]

Gib! +1

[Damosis 24]

Awesome, I want it.

[Jagdel 195]

Hope it's coming soon.