GhostSoph@psn 2,213 Report post Posted May 15, 2019 After a few matches...i am wondering if we really need the strategic layer AT THIS PHASE. The idea sounds good and all...but seems TOO MUCH at the same time... After all...this isn't really a Wargame (and i played lots of them). Some issues could be better fixed if the battles were "independent". Design them as HISTORICAL EVENTS (can even replace the present events). I like the national teams and "forced" lineups...battles "feel" more historical... Without the strategic layer it would be easier to achieve balance...less "factors" involved...and less matchmaking issues. So...we would get different combos (ground battle, ground convoy, etc...)...and anyone could join at anytime...just waiting for queue to fill. Many (most?) players are actually playing like this i think (no real attention to strategic layer) AFTER this mode was stable...then they could think about adding the strategic layer... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
