ZTL-11

[CXK114514 147]

Crew:4(commander gunner loader driver)

 

Weight:23t

 

Armor:

turret:aluminum+ceremic added-on armor

hull:steel+ceremic added-on armor

 

Transmission:9 forward/1 reverse

 

Engine:BF6M1015CP 442hp

 

Power/weight ratio:19.22hp/t

 

top speed on road：100km/h

 

amphibious capability:yes

 

Main gun:105mm ZPL98A cannon

(38 rounds,12 in turret bustle)

 

Ammunition：

From the left to the right:DTW/BTA2 APFSDS,GP105 ATGM,BTM1 AC,HE,and HEATFS

DTW2 APFSDS

BTA2 APFSDS

BTM1 AC

GP105 ATGM

 

Night visions:

gunner: thermal imaging camera

commander& driver: low-light level night vision devices.

 

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=Mzg3NzAxNzAyNA==&mid=2247484340&idx=1&sn=5f59aaac47a549ea1874a3a0ce49f2bb&chksm=cf28211bf85fa80df8fc6b62196c85560100cd49832b6a3689d6b8fe2b7f0f6c2ba960b30dfc&token=662483212&lang=zh_CN#rd

Edited September 28, 2019 by Index_Chan

[WulfPack 1,693]

I would also like to see the improved one

[CXK114514 147]

2 hours ago, WulfPack said:

I would also like to see the improved one

The one u have shown is a better choice for Chinese top tier.However,it is a underdeveloped prototype yet,we don't even know it's name,let alone technical performance.

Edited September 5, 2019 by KPzLeopard2

[WulfPack 1,693]

1 hour ago, KPzLeopard2 said:

The one u have shown is a better choice for Chinese top tier.

It's unlikely to be at the same BR as the Type 99s. Just like the Type 16 sits below the Type 90.

The one you've posted here will probably be about 8.7-9.0, while the newer one 9.3-9.7.

 

Edited September 5, 2019 by WulfPack

[Mishaa76 85]

20 hours ago, KPzLeopard2 said:

The one u have shown is a better choice for Chinese top tier.However,it is a underdeveloped prototype yet,we don't even know it's name,let alone technical performance.

That never stopped Gaijin before.

[PLA_Zheng_Wei 14]

Please, please, please. Chinese Centauro? YES PLEASE. And sure there's not a lot of information on it yet but the same could be said for the Japanese Type 16 which is entirely classified and we don't even know how many have been built for them either.

[他妈的打歪了 45]

I hope GJ can shift its energy to the Chinese  tree as soon as possible.

emmmm.......After the ZTL11,how about PTL02?

 

Chassis:WMZ551,Gun:Type1986 100mm（Type1969(used by T69) improved to Type1973,then Type1986 ）

 

[Taskforce404 210]

On 29/03/2020 at 18:07, Punisher8559 said:

I hope GJ can shift its energy to the Chinese  tree as soon as possible.

emmmm.......After the ZTL11,how about PTL02?

 

Chassis:WMZ551,Gun:Type1986 100mm（Type1969(used by T69) improved to Type1973,then Type1986 ）

 

this one should come before ztl11

[BRAAAP_STUTUTUU 620]

yeah the pl-02 should definitely come before since it's older and has less firepower (100mm rifled soviet derivative vs 105mm l7 derivative)

[DreamADream4Me 2,838]

I support, but you guys should really put these into the suggestion forum.

[Jackvony 599]

37 minutes ago, jackTIGR said:

I support, but you guys should really put these into the suggestion forum.

 I already did

 

 

[DreamADream4Me 2,838]

On 30/04/2020 at 21:11, Jackvony said:

 I already did

 

Excellent! Upvoted the thread and the poll. thank you. :)

[tiger7742 260]

100%

[NAYEONnaise 1,936]

is this thing immune to .50cal all around like other wheeled TDs ingame?

[llSolitairell@psn 5,730]

Obligatory:

 

Spoiler

 

3 hours ago, NAYEONnaise said:

is this thing immune to .50cal all around like other wheeled TDs ingame?

 

Some of them aren't even immune to .50s frontally, let alone 360 protection. Considering the ZTL-11 is also supposed to be amphibious I strongly doubt it.

[tiger7742 260]

One question, this thing should have a proper reverse, right?

Edited June 19, 2021 by tiger7742

[NAYEONnaise 1,936]

14 hours ago, llSolitairell@psn said:

Obligatory:

 

Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Some of them aren't even immune to .50s frontally, let alone 360 protection. Considering the ZTL-11 is also supposed to be amphibious I strongly doubt it.

the ZBL08 family has modular armor that can be installed/uninstalled per block. its mostly gonna protect from .50s all around and 20s from the front

4 hours ago, tiger7742 said:

One question, this thing should have a proper reverse, right?

the early version has just 1 reverse gear. but the later production versions sport advanced transmission, hope this makes for reliable reverse

[tiger7742 260]

2 hours ago, NAYEONnaise said:

the early version has just 1 reverse gear. but the later production versions sport advanced transmission, hope this makes for reliable reverse

Welp I hope they give it a good reverse then :P

[TrotylYu 116]

FYI the official name for this vehicle is ZLT11, not ZTL11:

[llSolitairell@psn 5,730]

In game statcard (dev stream)

 

BR: 9.3

Turret rotation: 26 deg/sec (max)

Gun angles: -4/+18

Reload: 7.5 seconds (max crew)

Weight: 23t

Engine: 440hp

Spoiler

 

DTW-105 APFSDS

10m: 408mm @0deg / 236mm @60deg 

 

Spoiler

 

Gets Tandem ATGMs, not sure about Proximity Fuse HE, arming distance wasn't given on the statcard

 

whole modifcation tree:

 

Spoiler

 

Type 83 APFSDS is a Rank I modification which is neat I guess

gets gunner and commander thermal optics

 

[xXGaijinedXx 499]

Interesting, 9.3 BR, why tho?

 

Comparing it with my Type 16 it seems worse it every way.

 

Turret rotation: 26 deg/sec (max) // Turret rotation: 30 deg/sec (max)

Gun angles: -4/+18 // Gun angles: -6° / 15°

Reload: 7.5 seconds (max crew) // Reload: 6.7 seconds (max crew)

Weight: 23t // Weight: 26t

Engine: 440hp - Engine: 570hp

 

ZTL will probably have worse reverse speed and it doesn't have any armor, firepower wise its the same 408mm - 405mm, both have gunner and commander thermals.

 

I'm missing something, why does it have 9.3 BR?

 

 

 

 

Edited October 15, 2021 by xXGaijinedXx

[llSolitairell@psn 5,730]

9 hours ago, xXGaijinedXx said:

Interesting, 9.3 BR, why tho?

 

Comparing it with my Type 16 it seems worse it every way.

 

Turret rotation: 26 deg/sec (max) // Turret rotation: 30 deg/sec (max)

Gun angles: -4/+18 // Gun angles: -6° / 15°

Reload: 7.5 seconds (max crew) // Reload: 6.7 seconds (max crew)

Weight: 23t // Weight: 26t

Engine: 440hp - Engine: 570hp

 

ZTL will probably have worse reverse speed and it doesn't have any armor, firepower wise its the same 408mm - 405mm, both have gunner and commander thermals.

 

I'm missing something, why does it have 9.3 BR?

 

I have no idea, +.3 BR for being amphibious?

 

Does anyone know what the reverse speed is?

 

Edited October 16, 2021 by llSolitairell@psn

[NAYEONnaise 1,936]

11 hours ago, xXGaijinedXx said:

Interesting, 9.3 BR, why tho?

 

Comparing it with my Type 16 it seems worse it every way.

 

Turret rotation: 26 deg/sec (max) // Turret rotation: 30 deg/sec (max)

Gun angles: -4/+18 // Gun angles: -6° / 15°

Reload: 7.5 seconds (max crew) // Reload: 6.7 seconds (max crew)

Weight: 23t // Weight: 26t

Engine: 440hp - Engine: 570hp

 

ZTL will probably have worse reverse speed and it doesn't have any armor, firepower wise its the same 408mm - 405mm, both have gunner and commander thermals.

 

I'm missing something, why does it have 9.3 BR?

 

 

 

 

The ammo is trash too. It didn't get the M900 equivalent, only the ATGM. But it stated in the devblog it should be immune to 23mm and 14.5mm autocannons in front and .50cal from the sides, and rifle caliber from the rear.

 

4 hours ago, llSolitairell@psn said:

 

I have no idea, +.3 BR for being amphibious?

 

Does anyone know what the reverse speed is?

 

What's the reverse speed? Couldn't see the image 

[llSolitairell@psn 5,730]

47 minutes ago, NAYEONnaise said:

The ammo is trash too. It didn't get the M900 equivalent, only the ATGM. But it stated in the devblog it should be immune to 23mm and 14.5mm autocannons in front and .50cal from the sides, and rifle caliber from the rear.

 

What's the reverse speed? Couldn't see the image 

 

8.5kph

[NAYEONnaise 1,936]

6 minutes ago, llSolitairell@psn said:

 

8.5kph

tf??? seriously my day is ruined. but i still have hope that it's a placeholder. i highly doubt that military vehicles have single digit reverse...