1.97 Rumor Round-Up and Discussion

[N8AHbl4 276]

18 minutes ago, gszabi99_HUN said:

On 17/12/2019 at 13:10, magazine2 said:

• YAH-64 images were accidentally uploaded to the PS4 store.

 

As far as I know, the prototype Apache will not be in the game. Bvv_d said that if there are no problems with licensing serial modifications, the prototype has no chances.
That's why they replaced YAH with Israeli camouflage.

[magazine2 7,957]

1 hour ago, gszabi99_HUN said:

<post> 

 

1 hour ago, gszabi99_HUN said:

Also: these are already in the game, you may want to remove them.

 

Thanks, done.

[Stavroforos 15,367]

1 hour ago, N8AHbl4 said:

As far as I know, the prototype Apache will not be in the game. Bvv_d said that if there are no problems with licensing serial modifications, the prototype has no chances.
That's why they replaced YAH with Israeli camouflage.

Where did this information come from? It's very nice if that's the case, I wasn't looking forward to the YAH. 

[gromvoiny 12,771]

10 hours ago, N8AHbl4 said:

As far as I know, the prototype Apache will not be in the game. Bvv_d said that if there are no problems with licensing serial modifications, the prototype has no chances.
That's why they replaced YAH with Israeli camouflage.

 

I suggest you to take a clue from the posts above and provide proofs of such claims. 

[Alpine222 265]

2 hours ago, gromvoiny said:

 

I suggest you to take a clue from the posts above and provide proofs of such claims. 

YAH confirmed 

[MERTRAL 1,685]

Well, if the yah and ah 64 comes, how it will be at his release ? 
 

Like the ka50, engaging enemies very far that even the Tunguska cant engage or seeing some new people that didn’t play war Thunder before and seeing teams dying after 2 min ?

 

i see only those 2 states

[NettoRama 138]

Unless it comes with new sensor updates or new FCS for helicopters in 1.97. The ka 50 will still out class it.

 

It will be very similar to the ah1z but with stingers.

Edited January 12, 2020 by NettoRama

[N8AHbl4 276]

8 hours ago, gromvoiny said:

I suggest you to take a clue from the posts above and provide proofs of such claims. 

to the person who asked the question, I already answered. 
And to you, I can tell you that I don't want to set up whoever told me that.
And rest of you, don't believe me.

[N8AHbl4 276]

5 hours ago, NettoRama said:

Unless it comes with new sensor updates or new FCS for helicopters in 1.97. The ka 50 will still out class it.

 

It will be very similar to the ah1z but with stingers

Spoiler

https://vk.com/wall-49597300_943691
This is my datamine, a lot of things have been talked about here. Apache isn't just a Viper, it has a lot of interesting features.

[gromvoiny 12,771]

1 hour ago, N8AHbl4 said:

to the person who asked the question, I already answered. 
And to you, I can tell you that I don't want to set up whoever told me that.
And rest of you, don't believe me.

 

Ah, classic “I know a guy who knows a guy”, predictable. 

[sargeanthashhash 803]

I guess this thread should take a break until it is mid February when I expect devblogs to start dropping down like under garments on Valentines day . .. . 

[N8AHbl4 276]

20 minutes ago, gromvoiny said:

Ah, classic “I know a guy who knows a guy”, predictable. 

Yes, that's exactly what it is.
 

[Bazbey 68]

On 17/12/2019 at 14:10, magazine2 said:

Chinese ground forces

• Confirmed: ZTZ99 - Source
• Confirmed: ZTZ99A - Source
• Confirmed: ZTZ63A - Source
• Confirmed: Type 79 - Source
• Confirmed: PGZ88 - Source
• Confirmed: PTZ89 - Source
• Confirmed: Sd Kfz 222 - Source
• Confirmed: Type 59-II - Source
• Confirmed: CM25 TOW - Source
• Confirmed: ZSD53 - Source

New technique, that's good. But I would like to correct errors for previously introduced equipment, especially the one that is given for money.

https://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/272192-191058-t-62-№545-oshibki-vneshnego-vida-modeli/

[jon_man1199 563]

On 11/01/2020 at 06:19, magazine2 said:

Are there any things in the OP that is missing that I should add, if so, please tag me. Thanks!

@magazine2 There was also this that appeared over the summer 

It may have some credibility to it (as a rumor), especially considering the recent release of several of the planes on this model list (J5N1, TIS MA and J6K) and the other models that appear on the linked page

[N8AHbl4 276]

2 hours ago, jon_man1199 said:

It may have some credibility to it (as a rumor), especially considering the recent release of several of the planes on this model list (J5N1, TIS MA and J6K) and the other models that appear on the linked page

Besides, he reposted the previously leaked photos.
 

[jon_man1199 563]

1 hour ago, N8AHbl4 said:

Besides, he reposted the previously leaked photos.
 

Indeed, there is that as well, he also added "Made for Warthunder" to them. Could probably add it to the list in all reality.  

[Stridswombat 1,089]

On 11/01/2020 at 18:27, EpicBlitzkrieg87 said:

I found the top speed of the J 35D and J at sea level

 

J 35 doesn't really have a set topspeed at high altitude other than above mach 2. Reason being is it would keep accelerating until it ran out of fuel and so no known actual top speed exists. Unless you spent the whole match just building speed it would not be possible to reach its topspeed and in fact even then it still wouldn't really be possible because it wasn't irl.

 

Also those are the specs for the J and not the D. The J is significantly different to the D internally with its avionics and even fixed armament and doesn't have the same performance. Basically it's an updated J 35F-2 that went through a substantial modernization program in the 80's. The D is still the fastest version of the lot. I also wouldn't be quick to trust that sheet since it gets the ammo quantity wrong.

 

Once again the A carried 90 rounds (per gun), everything up until the F carried 100 rounds staring with the B and the J carried 120 rounds due to more effective ammo storage and feeding. I suspect much of the rest is similarly wrong. The J also carried up to 6 RB 24J's unlike the prior versions.

[Stavroforos 15,367]

Yeah honestly it's just a random irrelevant picture.

[Smin1080p_WT 60,444]

On 12/01/2020 at 16:36, N8AHbl4 said:

Yes, that's exactly what it is.
 

 

Which is not a viable rumor. Anyone can claim to have been told something by someone and then have literally nothing to back it up with.

 

No proof = no post please. 

[irisarribase 179]

Is any posibility that APDS rework will come in 1.97?

[magazine2 7,957]

On 12/01/2020 at 21:49, jon_man1199 said:

@magazine2 There was also this that appeared over the summer 

It may have some credibility to it (as a rumor), especially considering the recent release of several of the planes on this model list (J5N1, TIS MA and J6K) and the other models that appear on the linked page

 

Added them since the TIS MA on that list was added recently so I take it as pretty reliable. 

[asuka1991 71]

Heared that China will get a new premium tank and it will be something not famous. What it will be?

[gszabi99_HUN 10,176]

17 minutes ago, magazine2 said:

 

Added them since the TIS MA on that list was added recently so I take it as pretty reliable. 

Did you just intentionally overlook the J5N1 and the J6K1? How dare you /s

[magazine2 7,957]

4 minutes ago, gszabi99_HUN said:

Did you just intentionally overlook the J5N1 and the J6K1? How dare you /s

 

Removed them now, sorry I can't keep up with all these useless Japanese planes they keep adding )))))))))))) (ok J6K1 is cool). 

[Shad0wChaser 33]

Do we have any new info on the B-26 being added? It is now the only thing I want more than anything else :c

 

Also, I know it isn't listed but...P-35??