Please Read Before Voting
115 members have voted
-
1. Which Variants Would You Like?
-
Sk 60B (Production Trainer / Attacker Variant)98
-
Sk 60C (Production Recon / Attacker; Sk 60B With Long Camera Nose, Otherwise Identical)81
-
Saab 105G (600mph Re-Engined Prototype With 2000kg Of Payload)104
-
I Don't Know3
-
None Of Them1
-
-
2. If Added, Which Vehicles Should Be Researchable?
-
Sk 60B (Production Trainer / Attacker Variant)87
-
Sk 60C (Production Recon / Attacker; Sk 60B With Long Camera Nose, Otherwise Identical)59
-
Saab 105G (600mph Re-Engined Prototype With 2000kg Of Payload)70
-
I Don't Know9
-
None Of Them1
-
-
3. If Added, Which Variants Should Be Premium?
-
Sk 60B (Production Trainer / Attacker Variant)17
-
Sk 60C (Production Recon / Attacker; Sk 60B With Long Camera Nose, Otherwise Identical)27
-
Saab 105G (600mph Re-Engined Prototype With 2000kg Of Payload)43
-
I Don't Know11
-
None Of Them36
-
-
4. If Added, Which Variants Should Be Event / Tournament / Squadron Rewards?
-
Sk 60B (Production Trainer / Attacker Variant)12
-
Sk 60C (Production Recon / Attacker; Sk 60B With Long Camera Nose, Otherwise Identical)21
-
Saab 105G (600mph Re-Engined Prototype With 2000kg Of Payload)19
-
I Don't Know13
-
None Of Them70
-
-
5. If Sk 60B And Sk 60C Were Both Researchable, Given That They're Functionally Identical How Should They Be Differentiated?
-
Give One AAMs At A Higher BR, One Without At A Lower BR14
-
Give One AIM-9Js At A Higher BR, One Without Slightly Lower28
-
Leave Their Armament Identical, But Give One the 1993 "Sk 60W" Engine Upgrade20
-
Don't Differentiate Them At All16
-
I Don't Know / Don't Mind36
-
Other (Please Comment)0
-
I Don't Want These Planes1
-
-
6. How Should The 1993 "Sk 60W" Engine Upgrade Be Implemented?
-
As Separate Vehicles (e.g. You Could Have Both Sk 60B & Sk 60B (1993) In A Lineup)32
-
As A Researchable Modification For The Base Models (After All, The Re-Engined Sk 60B Was Still An Sk 60B)25
-
As Default For Both Models4
-
As Default For One Model, To Make It Different From The Other13
-
As A Modification For One Model, To Make It Different From The Other11
-
I Don't Know27
-
Other (Please Comment)1
-
I Don't Want It1
-
I Don't Want These Planes1
-
-
7. If Added, What BR Range Should They Be?
-
4.0-4.70
-
5.0-5.71
-
6.0-6.78
-
7.0-7.734
-
8.0-8.735
-
I Don't Know / Don't Mind35
-
Other (Please Comment)1
-
I Don't Want Them1
-
-
8. If Added, What Camos Would You Like To See? (Multiple Choice; Example Images Available At Bottom Of Post)
-
Standard Bicolour Green & Brown Scheme98
-
Standard Bicolour Black & Dark Brown85
-
Standard Unpainted Metal Training Scheme75
-
Team 60 Display Livery (Green & Brown Upper Surfaces With Sky Blue Tail & Underside, Yellow Stripes On The Wings' Sky Blue Undersides, And "FLYGVAPNET" Across The Top Of The Wings)73
-
Second Prototype "SE-XBZ" Original Livery (Horizontal Striped Pattern Of Red, Yellow & Blue; Forms The Yellow Cross On Blue Of The Swedish Flag On The Tail)67
-
Early Prototype / Foreign Sales Scheme (Unpainted Metal With One Thick Black And One Thin Red Stripe Running Horizontally Along The Middle Of The Fuselage)65
-
Saab 105G Monocolour Medium Brown Scheme80
-
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next
- Page 1 of 2
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next
- Page 1 of 2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
Share
Followers
1
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.