Next patch and beyond wishlist - everything except trees

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

1 minute ago, Invader9908 said:

I'd love to see: 

1.  SEAD, DEAD and ECM mechanics. (We need to teach those smug SPAAs/ SAMs a lesson.)
2.  A new helo mode. The current helo EC isn't great.
3.  More helicopters. 
4.  A Sukhoi line. (Preferably after the Lavochkin line.) 
5.  HMMWVs with TOWs. (Other nations have light vehicles with ATGMs, why not a TOW-toting HMMWV for the US?)
6.  M1128 Stryker (maybe later in the future.)
7.  A naval overhaul. Suffice to say many things need to be changed with naval forces.

if air units get anti radiation missiles. Than SAMs will get them large hawk missiles, possibly Patriot vehicle launchers and S200 platforms.

[Necrons31467 14,236]

11 minutes ago, Manfred_Albrech said:

If T-90A, at least M1A2

 

???

 

1) M1A1 HA = M1A2 for in-game purposes.

2) T-90A is merely on-par, if not worse, than the T-80U already in-game, and yet the standard M1A1 already does fine against the T-80U.

3) US don't need more top-tier vehicles than they already have, all Gaijin needs to do is modify the current M1A1 into the M1A1 HA and shuffle some BR's around.

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

1 minute ago, Necrons31467 said:

 

???

 

1) M1A1 HA = M1A2 for in-game purposes.

2) T-90A is merely on-par, if not worse, than the T-80U already in-game, and yet the standard M1A1 already does fine against the T-80U.

3) US don't need more top-tier vehicles than they already have, all Gaijin needs to do is modify the current M1A1 into the M1A1 HA and shuffle some BR's around.

add HA mod to M1A1 and add M1A2 into the game. US needs vehicles with armor

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, Manfred_Albrech said:

Than SAMs will get them large hawk missiles, possibly Patriot vehicle launchers and S200 platforms.

The S-200 is more for hitting bombers than fighters.

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

3 minutes ago, Invader9908 said:

The S-200 is more for hitting bombers than fighters.

P25 TEL with SA-6 and Hawk.

 

Edited August 12, 2019 by Manfred_Albrech

[Han_Ri_Solo 26]

9 minutes ago, Invader9908 said:

I'd love to see: 

1.  SEAD, DEAD and ECM equipment and mechanics. (We need to teach those smug SPAAs/ SAMs a lesson.)
2.  A new helo mode. The current helo EC isn't great.
3.  More helicopters. 
4.  A Sukhoi line. (Preferably after the Lavochkin line.) 
5.  HMMWVs with TOWs. (Other nations have light vehicles with ATGMs, why not a TOW-toting HMMWV for the US?)
6.  M1128 Stryker (maybe later in the future.)
7.  A naval overhaul. Suffice to say many things need to be changed with naval forces.
8.  More early smart ordnance, like the AGM-62 for example. (Also maybe farther into the future.)

I would definitely agree a patch to counter these SAM's is welcome. Cross fingers the brits get something spicy i can see it now amazing Cas jet after right after Javelin 

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

9K33 Osa

9K31 Strela-1

 

MIM-104 Patriot

MIM-72 Chaparral 

[Necrons31467 14,236]

29 minutes ago, Manfred_Albrech said:

add HA mod to M1A1 and add M1A2 into the game. US needs vehicles with armor

 

So then what do other nations get?

 

A second Leopard 2A5 with DM43?

Another Leclerc?

T-90A?

Etc.

 

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

Just now, Necrons31467 said:

 

So then what do other nations get?

 

A second Leopard 2A5 with DM43?

Another Leclerc?

T-90A?

Etc.

 

Leopard 2a4 Pz 87WE

Leclerc 'Flakpanzer'

T-90A

nothing for brits

nothing for italy

Type 90 /Late

M1A1HA + M1A2

[Fireraid233 4,274]

1 hour ago, Manfred_Albrech said:

Leopard 2a4 Pz 87WE

Leclerc 'Flakpanzer'

T-90A

nothing for brits

nothing for italy

Type 90 /Late

M1A1HA + M1A2

I love the Type90. But is there a late version of the Type90? Is the one that we have a early version?

[wulfalier 2,470]

9 minutes ago, Fireraid233 said:

I love the Type90. But is there a late version of the Type90? Is the one that we have a early version?

This is the "late 90"

Copy/paste with mine roller,or with dozer blade

Spoiler

And btw on this picture you can see that the turret is nothing like in game,but we dont have documents.

Edited August 12, 2019 by wulfalier

[Oxynium 950]

My wishlist for 1.91?

 

Slow down on adding new content, focus more on general state of the game. Fix oldest bugs, look into general balance of the game, think about map layouts and rotation

[MasterOfUltramar 1,711]

9 minutes ago, Oxynium said:

My wishlist for 1.91?

 

Slow down on adding new content, focus more on general state of the game. Fix oldest bugs, look into general balance of the game, think about map layouts and rotation

careful you dont get censored for wanting the game fixed.

[Alan_Tovarishch 860]

3 hours ago, Necrons31467 said:

 

???

 

1) M1A1 HA = M1A2 for in-game purposes.

2) T-90A is merely on-par, if not worse, than the T-80U already in-game, and yet the standard M1A1 already does fine against the T-80U.

3) US don't need more top-tier vehicles than they already have, all Gaijin needs to do is modify the current M1A1 into the M1A1 HA and shuffle some BR's around.

1) Agreed. 
2) T-90A has better hull and turret armor than T-80U (1985, as ingame) also better ammo. Its a superior tank, on par with Leo 2A5, Leclerc and plausible M1A2).
3)  What is needed is a general BR decompression for top tier (see the first page of this thread, i made a decompression suggestion) 

[EpicBlitzkrieg87 8,350]

[mc205v 786]

9 hours ago, Necrons31467 said:

The following changes to top-tier, including ammunition changes, BR changes and a few new vehicles/armour modules here and there:

 

 

Obviously, the remaining nations would have to undergo similar changes, but I'm not knowledgable enough on them make those judgements.

 

On what evidence you justify these BR changes.

 

Edited August 13, 2019 by mc205v

[Necrons31467 14,236]

2 hours ago, Alan_Tovarishch said:

2) T-90A has better hull and turret armor than T-80U (1985, as ingame) also better ammo. Its a superior tank, on par with Leo 2A5, Leclerc and plausible M1A2).

 

T-90A's turret is stated to be more volume efficient, which was required for the additional electronics, I've yet to find any trustworthy source that does indeed state a solid armour increase.

 

Anyways, T-90A is also less mobile than the T-80U, and thus suits the META worse, and dispite some (minor) armour changes, the weakspots remain the same.

 

15 minutes ago, mc205v said:

On what evidence you justify these BR changes.

 

Huh?

 

[Alan_Tovarishch 860]

1 minute ago, Necrons31467 said:

 

T-90A's turret is stated to be more volume efficient, which was required for the additional electronics, I've yet to find any trustworthy source that does indeed state a solid armour increase.

 

Anyways, T-90A is also less mobile than the T-80U, and thus suits the META worse, and dispite some (minor) armour changes, the weakspots remain the same.

 

Oh this is easy: T-90A turret for starters is welded while T-80U is cast. That means an increase of effectiveness of around 10-15 percent, compared to a cast turret of equal weight and armor array (T-72B which should be a little stronger than T-80U).  
"Т-90С/А

Применительно к башням танков одним из существенных резервов усиления их противоснарядной защиты или снижения массы стальной основы башни при сохранении существующего уровня противоснарядной защиты является повышение стойкости применяемой для башен стальной брони. Основа башни Т-90С/А изготовлена из стальной брони средней твердости, которая существенно (на 10-15%) превосходит по противоснарядной стойкости литую броню средней твердости.

Таким образом, при одинаковой массе башня, выполненная из катаной брони, может иметь более высокую противоснарядную стойкость, чем башня из литой брони и, кроме того, в случае применения для башни катаной брони возможно дальнейшее повышение ее противоснарядной стойкости" 

SOURCE: http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/armor.htm 

[Louise_So_schoen 144]

On 12/08/2019 at 05:48, Nightshriker said:

Here you can wish-list and discuss future vehicles/mechanics/game-modes etc that you wan't to see for War Thunder!

Here you can read about rumors, data-finds and other compiled truths of what is going to be added in the next patch.

Please keep in mind that all vehicles already in-game have their own dedicated thread.
 

Also, do not assume moderators, staff or developers will read this thread to see your wishes.
 

If you want a suggestion to be seen by developers, you need to compile a suggestion over here and get it approved.



FAQ

 

Q: What is this thread about?

A:  This thread is about what vehicles you would like to see for 1.91 and future content.

Q: Is this where I can add suggestions?
A: No this is the place where you can rant about future wishes with others in the community.


Thank you to @Lord_of_Sofa for creating the Rumor thread from which the template I have copied.

Oh God Lord we don't want any new vehicles ! Just please make a good balance and fix hundreds of bugs ! 

 

Thank God ! 

[Guest]

I initially wanted to dismiss this thread as nonsense, but in honesty, this kind of a post is a good idea. It mitigates the "give [random AFV] in [update]" that usually springs up on the update rumor spread, clearly indicates what forum-goers want, and keeps it all in a neat thread so that it - hopefully - won't spread elsewhere. 

 

Good idea @Nightshriker.

Edited August 13, 2019 by Guest

[Louise_So_schoen 144]

13 hours ago, Necrons31467 said:

The following changes to top-tier, including ammunition changes, BR changes and a few new vehicles/armour modules here and there:

 

 

Obviously, the remaining nations would have to undergo similar changes, but I'm not knowledgable enough on them make those judgements.

 

No not today .

 

The "Cold War tanks" shouldn't have to face modern tanks . For example the Chieftains should be 8.0/8.3 and they won't see Leo2 & T72 on the other hand the IS-3 , WWII tanks, shouldn't get a similar BR as Centurion MK10 .       BTW Centurion just has the APDS for 7.7 ?!?!?!?!

 

 

 

 

[Louise_So_schoen 144]

13小时前，Rohrkrepiererer说：

 

我仍然不明白为什么他们给了T64B和T80B 3BM42 ......这对我来说没什么意义。

你想要什么 ？THAt被称为俄罗斯偏见吗？请习惯于此，因为这是在Gaijin的星球上。

[Охраняет-Камни 6,650]

I want Italian WWII HESH launcher!

Spoiler

 

And all the other guntracks!!!

 

I actually want a lot of new stuff, but at first I would like to see Ariete bugs fixes, Italian first rank machine guns fixes, the addition of the commander for 47/32 L40, 2nd loader and the opportunity to open sides for Breda 501, the opportunity to drop big bombs separately for SM.92, removal of machine gun port for Fiat 6614, the addition of SAPHEI-T shells for SIDAM-25 and belts for M42 Contraereo and etc.

Spoiler

Turned off hull ammo rack protection bug, transmission bug and etc.

 

https://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/260175-1850127-fiat-6614-ubrat-soshku-kotoraya-ne-ispolzuetsya/

 

[Stavroforos 15,367]

I think what I'd really like is for the game to appear to be better polished than it is now. Way back in the day it seemed as though things would get fixed and attempts would be made to make things look good at least, but now that doesn't seem to be the case. Like, there are still too many planes which have 3D models and skins from the Wings of Prey era

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, Stavroforos said:

I think what I'd really like is for the game to appear to be better polished than it is now. Way back in the day it seemed as though things would get fixed and attempts would be made to make things look good at least, but now that doesn't seem to be the case. Like, there are still too many planes which have 3D models and skins from the Wings of Prey era

Asset recycling FTW!