Why is gaijin so hostile to China TT?

[justin07555 25]

I asked this question because gaijin has not simply ignored or prioritized Chinese TT. They give people the feeling that they are completing a mandatory work, which has been completed in general, but there are loopholes everywhere.
1. Chinese TT has been in the game for several years, but the plan released that year has not been fully fulfilled. The whole TT is full of replicas and vacancies to be filled, such as helicopter TT that has been predicted for a year,  and CAS aircraft that have not been available by the air force. Gaijin can't don't know how to make Chinese TT better, But they choose not. Why?
2. Almost all of China's newly released vehicles and aircraft have fatal bugs, resulting in a significant reduction in playability, including but not limited to the permanent 8x magnification of advanced tanks, creative armor defects, I don't know why several tank crew models have been enlarged, and inferior missiles equipped with advanced aircraft, I'm tired of finding fatal bugs on Chinese new vehicles every time I see them. New vehicles usually take months to repair until they can be used normally. Some bugs haven't even been repaired yet.
3. The maintenance cost of China's replica vehicles is ridiculously high. Why does only adding a five-star sign in front lead to an increase of 8000? For example is-2 or F104, TT in other countries only needs thousands of silver coins for maintenance, but TT in China needs more than 10000 silver coins, and the only difference between them is the painting and the logo in front of the name.
4. China has a strange high weight. The most obvious thing is that China's f100a and the United States f100d are both 9.7, which is completely unreasonable. An improved aircraft is at the same level as the original?
I have been optimistic that gaijin needs time to fix it for so long since the TT was released in China, but I can only see that there are more and more bug reports in the forum, and gaijin has not responded

Edited December 6, 2021 by justin07555

[OddPhenomena 1,015]

The repair cost thing is really odd. I mostly play arcade and since silver lions have a lower modifier there, it seems odd to me that some vehicles have these repair costs. The Chinese IS-2s are a great example. I get Gaijin uses some magical statistics to calculate player / nation performance, but is the difference between Soviet and Chinese players really that big? Compare the Soviet and Chinese repair costs. Note that I have the Chinese IS-2 1943 close to spaded and the 1944 unmodified, while my IS-2 1943 is spaded and the 1944 one has nearly all modifications.

 

 

 

 

Now for the 1944 model.

 

 

 

Edited December 7, 2021 by OddPhenomena

[justin07555 25]

18 hours ago, OddPhenomena said:

维修费用的事情真的很奇怪。 我主要玩街机，因为银狮在那里有较低的修饰符，我觉得有些车辆有这些维修费用似乎很奇怪。 中国的IS-2就是一个很好的例子。 我知道 Gaijin 使用一些神奇的统计数据来计算玩家/国家的表现，但苏联和中国玩家之间的差异真的那么大吗？ 比较苏联和中国的维修费用。 请注意，我的中国 IS-2 1943 接近黑桃和 1944 未修改，而我的 IS-2 1943 是黑桃，而 1944 年几乎所有修改。

 

 

 

 

现在是 1944 年的型号。

 

 

 

There is also the air force. Since class IV, there are 13 Chinese aircraft with maintenance costs of nearly 10000 silver coins, while there are only 24 Chinese aircraft higher than or equal to class IV. I really wonder why a p-38l-1 without any modification needs 12000 silver coins for maintenance

[Pope_Shizzle 4,180]

On 07/12/2021 at 19:33, justin07555 said:

There is also the air force. Since class IV, there are 13 Chinese aircraft with maintenance costs of nearly 10000 silver coins, while there are only 24 Chinese aircraft higher than or equal to class IV. I really wonder why a p-38l-1 without any modification needs 12000 silver coins for maintenance

 

China suffers in the same way that most minor nations do.  Minor nations (non US, USSR, Germany) tend to attract better players.  Or players who have already finished with the US/USSR/Germany tree.  As a result, they play the vehicles better resulting in higher BR's and higher repair costs.

[FrostAceSagitta 18]

Players: Why is T-54 at 7.7 and Type 59 at 8.0?

Gaijin: Because Typer 59 has a vertical stabilizer

Players: Then why do pt-76 and pt-76B shares the same BR when pt-76B has a stabilizer and pt-76 doesn't.

Gaijin: Well.............................

 

[tiger7742 260]

On 15/12/2021 at 06:58, FrostAceSagitta said:

Players: Why is T-54 at 7.7 and Type 59 at 8.0?

Gaijin: Because Typer 59 has a vertical stabilizer

Players: Then why do pt-76 and pt-76B shares the same BR when pt-76B has a stabilizer and pt-76 doesn't.

Gaijin: Well.............................

 

very good point!

[hienapunk 1,065]

On 14/12/2021 at 15:58, FrostAceSagitta said:

Players: Why is T-54 at 7.7 and Type 59 at 8.0?

Gaijin: Because Typer 59 has a vertical stabilizer

Players: Then why do pt-76 and pt-76B shares the same BR when pt-76B has a stabilizer and pt-76 doesn't.

Gaijin: Well.............................

 

 

Well they just fixed that.