Jump to content

Heli PVE EC is really boring and disgusting, pls improve it!


YUi_Takamura
 Share

Improve Heli EC  

155 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want to improve heli PVP EC?

    • YES
      149
    • No, why?
      6
  2. 2. If you want to improve it, how?

    • Limit number of players in each battle
      63
    • Add more AIs and reduce AAs, make each EC battle lasts longer
      117
    • Add more high Value AIs
      79
    • More BR seprate, such as 8.0-9.0, 9.0-10.3, 10.7-11.3
      81
    • other ideas?
      14
  3. 3. Do you want Heli pvp EC back? If it is balanced

    • YES
      132
    • NO
      23


Heli PVE EC now will makes me feel like a machine, just luanch missiles to destroy AI, and I must keep it at least 1 week to get a new heli, which is really boring. And becuase of there are at least 8 players in each battle, The EC battle will be end in 1 hour.the competition is very fierce, there are few AIs for all of the players, those low BR heli players are very hard to get point, but like Mi24a/d or KA50 are very easily. During the EC battle, the AI update  also has issues, sometimes I need to wait 10mins, and I need cross half of the map to go there. I think Heli PVE is a very horrible mode for every heli player, even worse than PVP.

  • Like 4
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, KaKaParkChunghee said:

Heli PVE EC now will makes me feel like a machine, just luanch missiles to destroy AI

 

As opposed to flying around waiting to get yeeted by a fair and balanced Vikhr missile

 

the only thing I miss from old Heli EC is some of the random passive targets you could find on City/Tunisia/Zhengzhou/Vietnam if you snuck around the edges of the map behind all the Kamovs flicking missiles at each other

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, N4N4MiKo1t0 said:

I know some of the players vote yes, just because they want to use some shameless tricks to shorten the time of research, and all of them know that their data would get correction if Gaijin detected or other players reported their behaviors. They know the risk, they know Gaijin don't like their tricks, but they still want to do it, how dare them!


It's not going to come back. Under a PvP arena environment, it's a nightmare to properly balance various helicopters with very different capabilities/systems, when they were also not design to engage other air threats in the first place. Those that do have anti-air capabilities were only used for defensive situations.

 

 

4 hours ago, TuathadeDanaan said:

If I was one of the developer of Gaijin, I will never cancel heli-PVP, which incredibly increases the sale of KA-50.:lol2:

 

Perhaps, but in reality. You won't be able to make that call. That is a call from a higher up in an executive position when it comes to anything financial.

The developers role is to implement and maintain current features for the game project, assigned to them from the game's producer/director. Anything outside of that, they won't have a say so on the matter.

 

5 hours ago, N4N4MiKo1t0 said:

I know some of the players vote yes, just because they want to use some shameless tricks to shorten the time of research, and all of them know that their data would get correction if Gaijin detected or other players reported their behaviors. They know the risk, they know Gaijin don't like their tricks, but they still want to do it, how dare them!


You think? It's pretty obvious the reason and even the coordinated campaign to vote spam this thread.

At the end of the day, they are not going to revert months of work just because someone made a poll on the forums. It's only a small sample size when compare to the overall size of the WT community.

Edited by I_Termx_I
  • Upvote 1
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...