他妈的打歪了 45 Report post Posted October 1, 2022 (edited) First of all, this pack is obviously a temporary rush. When I purchased it, it owned 3bm25. It was later canceled. This approach of gaijin is very inappropriate.However, as long as gaijin can give refunds to people who no longer want to buy because of this change, then I don't want to discuss it any more. The administrator's explanation for this change in the forum is that 3bm25 is not historical.It is true that the Chinese army is not equipped with 3bm25.However, this also makes the 69IIA less characteristic than the 59A and t55a. It makes it a very mediocre and embarrassing pack.The apfsds produced in China for 100mm rifled guns have much better performance than 3bm25.This is a picture of the shell.100mm Norinco APFSDS - APFSDS 채널 (arca.live).It is said to be consistent with the M1000A1 of Belgium.Equipping the 69IIa with this shell also seems inappropriate. In fact, it is very simple to solve this problem.Because the PLA was never equipped with the 69IIA. The naming conventions of PLA tanks have changed several times.During this period, those with "II" were dedicated to foreign trade.For example，69II，79II，80II. It was a tank customized by Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War in order to replenish and replace the T54/55 series.Upgraded power and fire control systems. The immature 100mm smoothbore gun was replaced by a 100mm rifled gun, compatible with USSR 100mm shells.In real history, Iraq used both Soviet and Chinese-made shells. So, just change the operator country of 69IIa to Iraq. It solves the problem of "2bm25 is not historical". It's also more historical.After all, one shell was cancelled because the PLA was not equipped. But the PLA was not equipped with such a tank. The countries that actually equipped the tank were equipped with such shells.It is so weird! Edited October 1, 2022 by Punisher8559 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PePeLeSpew 27 Report post Posted October 1, 2022 (edited) Wow, they took the APFSDS round eh? Geeze, more of the same crap. They intro'd the SU-25 at 9.3, then within half a day, after selling how many, bumped the Br up. I wonder how many they sold of the T69 before the change... Edited October 1, 2022 by PePeLeSpew Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HauptmannTinus 144 Report post Posted October 1, 2022 That's one of the reasons why i never buy pre orders and buy mostly anything only on sale Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
他妈的打歪了 45 Report post Posted October 2, 2022 After all，Temporarily decided project, and not taken seriously. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanguardX2 166 Report post Posted October 2, 2022 I do not think the tank is as bad as you make it out to be (using the terms like "embarrasing" and "very medicore")....but to each his own. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
他妈的打歪了 45 Report post Posted October 3, 2022 Comparison produces results. Compare it with its close relatives t55a and t55am. This is a premium pack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
