不是很能抗压 1,265 Report post Posted April 4, 2023 (edited) Internal part of QN-506, Three people. Spoiler UAV, it is the one which u can use in April Fool event now. Spoiler 4x S-507 Loitering Munition, can't use in WT. Spoiler 4+4x QN-502C Spoiler 20x QN-201 Spoiler Edited April 5, 2023 by Zero_Seeker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craftfaster2 6 Report post Posted April 4, 2023 watch them put it at 9.7 instead of 11.0. I don't believe the games ready for this yet. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_RemiliaScarlet__ 355 Report post Posted April 5, 2023 Definitely not the Terminator I expected to see first, shame it's event and not Tech Tree since China is sorely lacking in the high tier IFV department, but if it plays anything like some of the other anti-everything IFVs (or in this case IFV style vehicle), it's going to be extremely potent, maybe brought alongside 11.0 lineups to fill out support roles, will grind this for sure over a mediocre ground attack jet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
不是很能抗压 1,265 Report post Posted April 5, 2023 9 minutes ago, _Happy_Chaos_ said: Definitely not the Terminator I expected to see first, shame it's event and not Tech Tree since China is sorely lacking in the high tier IFV department, but if it plays anything like some of the other anti-everything IFVs (or in this case IFV style vehicle), it's going to be extremely potent, maybe brought alongside 11.0 lineups to fill out support roles, will grind this for sure over a mediocre ground attack jet. I don't doubt that we will see the tech tree IFV in next update. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaekoB 2,053 Report post Posted April 5, 2023 22 hours ago, Craftfaster2 said: watch them put it at 9.7 instead of 11.0. I don't believe the games ready for this yet. There's nothing inherently better with fire and forget ATGMs than what we have now, in fact, I'm sure it's going to lock to a target and hit the same place all the time, either the barrel or the engine deck and not the center mass of the target. Something where mouse guided ATGMs are far superior. The no-line-of-sight part wont be implemented into the game, I'm sure of that. I would personally take mouse guided ATGMs over lock on ATGMs. If it's anything like Krizantema or helicopter AGMs I would rather guide them manually every single time. The whole ZPS99 is also mounted on the ZTZ59 chassis which was outdated even at 7.7, so this thing isn't 11.0 material in any shape or form. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AventadorLam 12 Report post Posted April 6, 2023 (edited) 12 hours ago, SaekoB said: There's nothing inherently better with fire and forget ATGMs than what we have now, in fact, I'm sure it's going to lock to a target and hit the same place all the time, either the barrel or the engine deck and not the center mass of the target. Something where mouse guided ATGMs are far superior. The no-line-of-sight part wont be implemented into the game, I'm sure of that. I would personally take mouse guided ATGMs over lock on ATGMs. If it's anything like Krizantema or helicopter AGMs I would rather guide them manually every single time. The whole ZPS99 is also mounted on the ZTZ59 chassis which was outdated even at 7.7, so this thing isn't 11.0 material in any shape or form. What do you mean by "The no-line-of-sight part wont be implemented into the game, I'm sure of that."? How are you sure about that? This has been implemented and tested in Warfare 2077 event exactly two years ago on the Hydra missile tank. What you said is simply wrong. This is only a matter of decision making of whether if it's balance breaking. Edited April 6, 2023 by AventadorLam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llSolitairell@psn 5,730 Report post Posted April 6, 2023 1 hour ago, AventadorLam said: What do you mean by "The no-line-of-sight part wont be implemented into the game, I'm sure of that."? How are you sure about that? This has been implemented and tested in Warfare 2077 event exactly two years ago on the Hydra missile tank. What you said is simply wrong. This is only a matter of decision making of whether if it's balance breaking. Gaijin have said several times they will not implement NLOS. Even citing the same bug from the 2077 event that gave the Swedish UDES NLOS missiles; that it was completely broken and non-competitive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShOt_MaCkEr 296 Report post Posted April 6, 2023 13 minutes ago, llSolitairell@psn said: Gaijin have said several times they will not implement NLOS. Even citing the same bug from the 2077 event that gave the Swedish UDES NLOS missiles; that it was completely broken and non-competitive. *Broken and non-competetive* - uless it's made by russia ofc. (or china in current state of things) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
