Nuckerball 275 Report post Posted May 13, 2023 http://www.military-today.com/tanks/type_98_l1.jpg can we maybe see the 98 as a bolster to the ground tree? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunayyan_503_@psn 5 Report post Posted May 14, 2023 Type 98 It would be a nice addition and can be 10.3 or 10.0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckerball 275 Report post Posted May 14, 2023 4 hours ago, Thunayyan_503_@psn said: Type 98 It would be a nice addition and can be 10.3 or 10.0 Sorta like a juiced up 96a Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
不是很能抗压 1,265 Report post Posted May 14, 2023 (edited) ZTZ98 is a wrong name, the real name is ZTZ99-I, imo it can be in 10.3 with DTW2-125(about 550 pen), ZTZ96A1(ZTZ96A with additonal 100hp) can also be in 10.3. ZTZ96A 10.0-> ZTZ96A1 10.3-> ZTZ99-I 10.3-> ZTZ96B 10.7-> ZTZ99-II 10.7 Edited May 14, 2023 by 不是很能抗压 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet_17_49 411 Report post Posted May 16, 2023 On 14/05/2023 at 13:29, Nuckerball said: Sorta like a juiced up 96a Functionally more of a clean T-72B with a semi modern FCS and useable forward mobility Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llSolitairell@psn 5,730 Report post Posted May 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, jet_17_49 said: Functionally more of a clean T-72B with a semi modern FCS and useable forward mobility Alternatively: a 99-II without ERA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
