Drahau 682 Report post Posted September 4, 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Ju_287 Apparently it was built and even took flight. It would be a nice and interesting addition to the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXTOR_9 711 Report post Posted September 4, 2022 there's a suggestion page for it already and well it is possible and very likely going to be an event vehicle. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaelan@psn 1,951 Report post Posted September 4, 2022 It was an aerodynamic test bed with no armament or ordnance, how would it be a nice addition? it wouldn't be able to do anything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXTOR_9 711 Report post Posted September 4, 2022 It is on the edge of the criteria Gaijin made for themselves. It was built, there's flight data, and the only thing missing is the armament. Couldn't really guess what will Gaijin do with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomusuke1 1,217 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 (edited) On 04/09/2022 at 06:06, gaelan@psn said: It was an aerodynamic test bed with no armament or ordnance, how would it be a nice addition? Because obviously gaijin will have to implement the Ju 287 A and not a Versuchs series wing testbed or unarmed prototype... Edited September 6, 2022 by Chomusuke1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dianeces 160 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 4 hours ago, Chomusuke1 said: Because obviously gaijin will have to implement the Ju 287 A and not a Versuchs series testbed prototype... Fascinating. I wasn't aware they started construction on any A series airframes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaelan@psn 1,951 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 33 minutes ago, Dianeces said: Fascinating. I wasn't aware they started construction on any A series airframes. 80-90% complete according to Wikipedia, a lot more than the Kronshtadt anyway hahaha 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Prism 1,824 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 11 minutes ago, gaelan@psn said: 80-90% complete according to Wikipedia, a lot more than the Kronshtadt anyway hahaha And with other aircraft being armed with armaments it never carried (XP-50,Ho 229, that one american pusher aircraft) If a prototype flew and had minimal changes necessary to add defensive armaments, why not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
qpranger 1,887 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 On 04/09/2022 at 13:06, gaelan@psn said: It was an aerodynamic test bed with no armament or ordnance, how would it be a nice addition? it wouldn't be able to do anything Scout drone on steroids? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dianeces 160 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 23 minutes ago, gaelan@psn said: 80-90% complete according to Wikipedia, a lot more than the Kronshtadt anyway hahaha You should go back and read that section of Wikipedia a bit more carefully. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaelan@psn 1,951 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 30 minutes ago, Dianeces said: You should go back and read that section of Wikipedia a bit more carefully. Why? "Approximately 80-90 percent complete by war's end" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dianeces 160 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, gaelan@psn said: Why? "Approximately 80-90 percent complete by war's end" "construction of the V3 had reached 80-90 percent completion". Now go look at the original thing you quoted. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaelan@psn 1,951 Report post Posted September 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Dianeces said: "construction of the V3 had reached 80-90 percent completion". Now go look at the original thing you quoted. What are you on about? just tell me straight instead of being vague and confusing, please 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
