Rorszaker 212 Report post Posted July 16, 2017 Hello. I found a bug in the T95 vehicle. In case of damage to one caterpillar the vehicle stops moving forward / back can only turn. In the pictures below you can see the connection of the extra tracks at one point. If the outer / inner tracks is damaged, the opposite will continue to work. It will be harder to drive but it will be possible. (Extra: Maximum speed T95 GMC is 13 and not 12 km / h) Sorry for previous bad section 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzleflash98 1,697 Report post Posted July 16, 2017 But that would take extra coding and could frustrate other players comrade.... (+1, there are a lot of things like this that need fixed) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godman_82 9,389 Report post Posted July 18, 2017 So it this case You would literally drove off You track? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorszaker 212 Report post Posted July 18, 2017 I know. That may be a problem. Leave the track on ground hehe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godman_82 9,389 Report post Posted July 18, 2017 If sim battles would ever changed into "non repair mode", then this feature would be of great use 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barial 3,579 Report post Posted July 18, 2017 (edited) Really good photos showing the inner protection and lack of side armor in game. Side slope looks same as the front of the slope at 100mm. The 2 inner plates that attach together should be added to the side protection of the T95 making the side rounds to ammo rack near impossible, especially these angle shoots that constantly destroy it. This is the T28 showing 50mm side armor so both plates that join on the T95 = 100mm and now with T95 side skirt and the 50mm side skirt shown on the T28 makes a 150mm (T95@100mm+50mm) side skirt plus all the tracks and gear. I am just putting this out there, but seem to me the T95 is a serious tank to pen from the side as well??? Edited July 18, 2017 by barial 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorszaker 212 Report post Posted July 19, 2017 (edited) Actually. I was interested in tracks and did not notice it. It is even more difficult to destroy T95 ammunition explodes there very quickly. But look at photos 21 hours ago, Godman_82 said: If sim battles would ever changed into "non repair mode", then this feature would be of great use Very good ideaBut the AB should be a repair option anyway. RB and SB would be cool... Or long repair time +1min Edited July 19, 2017 by Rorszaker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonimo_LLopi 1,676 Report post Posted July 19, 2017 22 hours ago, barial said: Really good photos showing the inner protection and lack of side armor in game. Side slope looks same as the front of the slope at 100mm. The 2 inner plates that attach together should be added to the side protection of the T95 making the side rounds to ammo rack near impossible, especially these angle shoots that constantly destroy it. -Snip- This is the T28 showing 50mm side armor so both plates that join on the T95 = 100mm and now with T95 side skirt and the 50mm side skirt shown on the T28 makes a 150mm (T95@100mm+50mm) side skirt plus all the tracks and gear. I am just putting this out there, but seem to me the T95 is a serious tank to pen from the side as well??? This really old post by Whelmy reveals the correct side armour: On 28/7/2015 at 3:47 AM, Whelmy said: Spoiler Upper spaced armour area on the T95 sides. A fellow who worked on the T95 when they started to do some restoration work on it said "Thickness of the straight sides of the detachable track is 83mm. Thickness of the angled upper armor on the detachable track is 75mm. Vehicle has extremely wide turning radius as well (about 28 meters). The commander's and driver's cupolas are the same as used on the M4 series Sherman and the M26 Pershing tanks. About 76mm thick and about 210mm tall with the hatch closed." Spoiler Also that outer tracks side inner armour plate it's indeed modeled as 1 inch (I don't know how true that thickness taking into account how the other armour thicknesses are incorrect): Spoiler That slight increase on side armour thickness would GREATLY increase ricochet chances because it's thicker and there's less overmatch (before overmatch T95 sides were like old T-34 UFP ricochets) The upper sides are probably wrong too, it would be very stupid to put all that spaced side armour on the middle/lower side to then put on the non spaced upper armour weakspot with only 63.5mm And the upper side in the game it's all cast but on those photos I can clearly see were the cast stops with a weld with other plate (Probably Rolled) Spoiler And this Cast to Rolled technique reminds me of this vehicle we have in game that uses it: Spoiler Here are all the other photos: http://www.armorjournal.com/index-spg-T28_NACM.php 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorszaker 212 Report post Posted November 25, 2017 Up. Gaijin look at this 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
