Jump to content

ZTZ99A insufficient/unnecessarily nerfed UFP protection?


NAYEONnaise
 Share

the ZTZ99A, despite being a new model with supposedly better protection than the 99-III, seems to be a direct downgrade in terms of UFP armor.

1. Why is the UFP weaker than the 99-III despite the near-similar ERA arrangement and hull angles?

Spoiler

544000114_99Aangle99-IIIaddedin.jpg.24b6

Spoiler

1689384833_99Aarrangement.jpg.b379940fbf

Spoiler

990062380_99-IIIarrangement.jpg.fdc7ee60

 

2. There is no weight reduction from the 99A that signifies armor loss. It also gained 4 tons from the new engine (ZTZ99-III: 51t, ZTZ99A: 55t), and maybe other factors.

supplementary question: can anyone here verify the weight of the 12V150HB-1 engine by itself?

 

3. See below the comparison of the 99A and 99-III in terms of UFP protection vs. DM53-120-L55.

99A

Spoiler

99A.jpg.6c5eb747b10b3e086f29c950ab5e659e

99-III

Spoiler

99-III.jpg.8b16e340026ad9c74e5d66b8d6c12

 

4. Is it only really the 99A's turret that is covered with FY-5 (Relikt-like in terms of protection), and not the upper hull (currently only using FY-4)?

 

For anyone experiencing the same issue, feel free to expound on this or provide publicly available sources to solidify this claim, and I might add these and credit those who do so, in this existing report: ZTZ99A has weaker UFP armor than ZTZ99-III // Gaijin.net // Issues

For mods/devs who happen to go through this, feel free to provide an explanation why this is a phenomenon, for the sides to understand each other.

 

Looking forward for this issue to be resolved/for sides to understand each other,

NAYEONnaise

Edited by NAYEONnaise
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 4
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...