Jump to content

Iranian Ground Forces Tech Tree


NotKringe
 Share

Poll  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like to see the Iranian Ground Forces tech tree in the game?

    • Yes
      82
    • No
      51


 

188px-Flag_of_Iran_svg.png.f2de9e0bd5703 Iranian Ground Forces Tech tree 

C6u-U-Oj-XUAUgllb.jpg.0d44fcf0649488495c

The Karrar MBT during a training exercise.

 

 

Historical background:

Spoiler

Contary to popular beliefs that Iran were still mainly using a leftover US-supplied military hardwares from the Shahist era and Soviet/Chinese supplied armaments, Iran have developed their own self-sufficient armed force industries and are capable of designed their own vehicle. Thought it's not until the last few decades that Iran managed to combine the best of the eastern and western bloc's armaments to create their own vehicle derivated from them.

 

To understand how did Iran managed to get their hands on the western technology, we need to get back to the Shahist Persian era (prior the 1979 revolution). Back then, the Imperial State of Persia ruled was by the Pahlavi dynasty, who alligned themselves with the western democratic bloc to counter the neighboring Soviet influrences. As such, the United States and the United Kingdom began selling a huge quantities of weapons and armaments to Persia in exchange with the country's rich gas and petroleum resources. Sometimes even selling the latest equipment to Persia before these countries adopted it for their own use (such as the F-14 and Chieftain tank). However, due to increasingly high unrest among the population due to failing economy, as well as several suppressive attempt by the pro-western Shahist regime. The Iranian Revolution occured in 1979, replacing the 2,500 years imperial dynastic history of Iran with the Islamic Republic. As the new Islamic Republic later revealed itself to be an anti-western government, the US and UK decided to cancel all of the military supply to Iran amidst increasing military tensions.

 

As Iran were still recovering from the aftermath of the revolution and the embargo, the neighboring Iraq has invaded Iran in 1981. With Iran suffered from the lack of spare parts for western-supplied equipment from Shahist era, Iran turns themselves to the former communist enemies and bought a large amounts of surplus equipment from the USSR, China, and North Korea to fulfil their short-term needs.

 

Even before Iran managed to repel the Iraqi invasion in 1988, the Iranian leadership finds it neccessary for the country to develop their own independent military industry to relinquish the need to purchase the weapons from other countries, as Iran were under constant sanctions by the western blocs after the revolution. And thus, in 1981, Iran's Ministry of Defence founded the Defense Industries Organization (DIO), a government-owned arms development company to fulfil this purposes.

 

To gain the experience neccesary for arms development, in 1991, Iran contracted the USSR for a license to built the T-72 MBT under designation T-72S. After gathering enough engineering knownledge, Iran then decided to reverse-engineered the western-supplied equipment and try to apply the advantages of the western tanks with the powerful Soviet armaments.

 

After years of trial-and-error, in early 2000s, Iran managed to develop their first domestically-designed MBT, the Zulfiqar. The tank is essentially a heavily modified M60 hull with a newly-designed turret to fit the Soviet armaments. Since then, the Iranian arms industry has grew increasingly independent from foreign suppliers, with only the reproduced parts of various foreign design as a hint of what the tank was based on.

 

Due to how the DIO usually subcontracted several smaller arm producer firms within Iran to produce a new vehicle based on a certain specifications, this often results into a wide discrepantcy of the built of the vehicle. Ranking from a cheap conversion from existing and readily available platforms into a delicated purpose-built combat vehicle.

 

Description:

  • To avoid most of the "copy-paste" vehicle, the Iranian ground tree will start at Rank IV. The requirements to unlock the Iranian tree will be similar to that of the recently implemented Israeli tech tree: Players have to get at least one Rank V ground vehicle from one of the four main tech trees; USA, USSR, UK, and China. Whose are the main arm suppliers to Iran prior the establishments of the DIO.
  • The vehicles in this tech tree will mostly consists of an Iranian domestically-produced vehicles as well as modernizations, thought a handful of the "copy-paste" vehicles (there's only few of them) will be present at early ranks to represent Iran's earlier history as a major western bloc allies as well as vehicles used in the Iraq-Iran war.
  • Due to the lack of information in most vehicles, most of the vehicle's specifications is mostly a speculations unless stated by the Iranian military or military experts.
  • This proposal is a spin-off of Borotovas' "Arab-Iranian Ground Forces Tech tree" proposal. I've decided to clear off most of the "copy-paste" vehicles and re-arrage the tree to fit with the suitable role for each vehicle. Thanks Borotovas for granting a permission for me to use some of the materials of his suggestion.

 

Vehicles:

 

Spoiler

Line 1 - Light tanks

Spoiler

BMP-1

Spoiler

80333365-3191760.jpg.dffb28d6f02108e4734

Essentially the basic BMP-1 you found in the Soviet tree, so it's basically a copy-paste to fill the gap.

 

Rank V BR: 7.3

Boragh AIFA

Spoiler

13770303-4523781.jpg.be2cbf0bc0e58745ecd

A variant of Boragh IFV, an Iranian version of BMP-1, this version is equipped with 90 mm Toophan ATGM launcher (persumeably an early variant).

 

Rank V Estimated BR; 7.0

Heidah 6

Spoiler

Iranian-BTR-60-PB-Grom-Turret1.jpg.6ce16

 

An Iranian modified BTR-60PB fitted with BMP-1's turret. Equipped with the same 73 mm 2A28 cannon and an ATGM.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.7

Tosan

Spoiler

9.jpg.481038f8e3ae5964795cbac8fe9cc06e.j

An Iranian upgrade of the FV 101 Scorpion, equipped with 90 mm Toophan 5 laser-guided missile.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.3

 

Boragh COBRA

Spoiler

cobraproduction_001.jpg.e56669ec8fc738f2'

An upgraded version of the Boragh IFV, features two 30 mm 2A42 cannons and an option to mount Toophan 5 launchers

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.0

 

Makran

Spoiler

98.png.c291796bf1033e734bc3556cb5815fa5.

A heavily-upgraded BTR-50 equipped with 30 mm 2A42 cannon and two Tosan 5 laser-guided missiles.

Rank VII Estimated BR: 9.3

 

Line 2 - Western MBTs

Spoiler

M48A5 Patton

Spoiler

Iran20080708199547633338lq7.jpg.1afd6b1f'

Not entirely copy-paste (but still works the same) as the M48A1 in the US tree. This tank were widely used prior the Iranian revolution.

 

Rank V BR: 7.3

M60A1

Spoiler

n2716205-3900913.jpg.3da25e03ddd51f3e39b

Again, a copy-paste vehicle. Works the same as the M60 in the tech tree. A more interesting variant of this tank will be appeared along the line.

 

Rank VI BR: 7.7

Sabalan

Spoiler

Blr-Tl-FLCQAE4-EBg-jpg-large.jpg.f372d30 sabalan_l1.jpg.277764ca41f3f87e5c80dcc8e

 

The Sabalan is an early attempt by the Iranian army to modernize the M47 Patton (not included in the suggestion as it's a bit reduandant), the tank is essentially a normal M47, but with M60's engine and 105 mm guns. The tank also have a new fire control system, laser rangefinder, and enlarged turret to fit the 105 mm Iranian HM-49L gun, which is based on the British L7 gun.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.0

Samsam

Spoiler

samsam-image1.jpg.35e75dbb9c96343b104c16

DSC0213.jpg.5cecc1850dac09025bc6097b7e85

A modernization of the M60A1, replacing the Browning MG on the miniturret with a laser targeting and rangefinding system, as well as an Iranian 105 mm HM-49L. Can be equipped with ERA package.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.7

Mobarez

Spoiler

ELka-IKCWs-AASeyh.jpg.4f0e5413fae655db9d

army-daywwwsejilir-059-20100426-19500903

The Mobarez may looks like an ordinary FV4201 Chieftain, but it is actually a modernized variant with an Iranian 100 mm Sa'ir cannon, which is in turn an upgrade of the Soviet 100 mm KS-19 AA gun. The tank were also outfitted with the more powerful Russian V-84 engines.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.7

Tiam

Spoiler

tiam-image01.jpg.fd98593100fe0d26d55a8c1

C9z-E5j7-Xk-AEg8-Oy.jpg.9656eb1f0c5517ef

 

The Tiam is best described as a "Frankenstein" tank -  It was described by the Iranian military as an "optimized" version of the Sabalan. As such, it was based on the M47 hull. Yet its armaments were all over the place; the turret were a heavily modified Type 59/69 turret, it retains the same 105 mm HM-49L (L7) guns as the Sabalan, using a Russian fire control system, an "upgraded" engine of unknown origin, and a domestically-made ERA package.

 

Rank VI BR: 9.7

Zulfiqar 1

Spoiler

zulfiqar_1_l6.jpg.61dc34db13a51025526e0f

zulfiqar_1_l7.jpg.4e6d02cbeded02127983b4

zulfiqar_1_l4.jpg.112eddaa1748d4f8a83f89

The Zulfiqar 1 were the first fully-domestically designed and produced MBT of Iran. Its suspension were based on the M60, and the main fire control system were taken from the T-72. The tank is equipped with 125 mm smoothbore cannons and is protected by a composite armor at the frontal arc.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 10.0

Zulfiqar 3

Spoiler

Zolfaghar3Tank1.jpg.4fce0657294f338a0c5b

5788.png.e75672b4c4459510691f9f8d816db42

24981d1303781571-zulfiqar-3-mbt-26-14710

The Zulfiqar 3 bears striking visual resermblance to the M1 Abrams, although the tank is using a similar components from the M60. The hull of the tank is built from scratch, with an extended suspension to accomodate composite armor, more powerful engine, Soviet 125 mm Smoothbore gun with an autoloader, and a new fire control system. The tank is similar in size of that of the M60, but longer.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 10.7

 

Line 3: Eastern MBTs

Spoiler

T-54/55A

Spoiler

k9c.png.d97b8903e8ff2d5b4d8d11c1e38ca5e4

Essentially a copy-paste of the T-54/55A we have in the Soviet tech tree. These two will be foldered.

 

Rank V, BR: 7.7 & 8.0

T-72S

Spoiler

x00801104127.jpg.80da72f6063f3beed6e03f0

5ros8m.jpg.a8bb283c84e372b8450bfed9a5b0e

The T-72S were the first tank to be domestically produced by Iran. The tank was a license-built version of the Russian T-72 and received several upgrade throughout its service life.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.3 

T-72Z (Safir-74)

Spoiler

T-55-IRAN.jpg.1178c6d7a1f2ceb277e1efb3b5

09zGB7I.jpg.ac21d3d0b2c321113bc0f5449969

Confusingly. Despite its name, it's in fact a modernized T-55A/Type 69 and an antithesis of the Mobarez, since this is in fact a Soviet tank armed with the 105 mm HM-49L, a gun based on the British L7 and the American M68 gun and capable of firing an ATGM and NATO standard rounds. The tank were also equipped with an ERA package, a stabiliser, a balistic computer, a second generation night-vision device, and a laser rangefinder. These equipment were later shared with the Tiam.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.7

T-72M1 Rakhsh

Spoiler

T-72M_Rakhsh_MBT.jpg.93770a290a23c68b3bf 758.png.bf5a43363e8ffb2a25dc18d73fdfdec1

The Rakhsh is an upgrade of the T-72S for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The upgrade features laser warning system, advanced ballistic computers, and an improved ERA.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 10.7

T-72M1 (2020)

Spoiler

FG_3336991-JDW-7497.jpg.64619af4033a4659

A heavily modernized variant of the T-72M1 based off of the Karrar MBT outfitted with several new features as described in the image above, thought the commander's sight found in the Karrar is missing, and the tank is outfitted with a different turret.

 

Rank: VII Estimated BR: 11.0

Karrar

Spoiler

Iranian_third_generation_tank-Karrar.jpg karrar_l1.jpg.ebb1a3631c363a4e948c343f4e

karrar_l4.jpg.8447dec086e5655d73be38b980

5369142-180.jpg.94047e7d83d6c4052ccd80b6

The Karrar is an Iranian "new generation main battle tank" equipped with several advanced features, such as advanced ballistic computers, advanced radar warning signs, and commander/gunner panoramic sights. The tank is strikingly similar to that of the T-90MS, thought some difference can be observed. Most notably the smaller ERA package. Other than the Soviet-based rounds, the tank can also fire the Tondar guided all-purpose missile from the gun barrel. The aforementioned missile is later refitted into other T-72 upgrades armed with a similar gun, as well as the Zulfiqar 3 equipped with the same gun.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 11.3+? (if BR ceiling has risen, of course)

 

Line 4: Tank Destroyer/SPG line

Spoiler

Aghraeb

Spoiler

fnvKVz5.jpg.8369256f64e566915d7110fc7629

The Aghareb is a peculiar "wheeled tank" based on the BTR-60PB, the "tank" is armed with a 90 mm cannon of unspecified model, a .50 cal Browning MG, and a coaxial 7.62 mm .30 cal machine gun. The vehicle is supposed to be equipped with a modern fire control system.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.0 

Raad 1

Spoiler

855.png.8bc17f1be46848e5e262f4b64387210a

The Raad 1 is an SPG/tank destroyer prototype developed from Boragh IFV in 1990s, the vehicle is armed with a 122 mm smoothbore cannon.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.3

Hoveizeh

Spoiler

n2673139-3825132.jpg.071148354057823e35e

The Hoveizeh is an upgrade of the American M109A3 SPG.

 

Rank V Estimated BR:7.7

Safir (Tosan ATGM)

Spoiler

IMG-7663-281029.jpg.9617e7ca36bb10d50f2b

The Safir is an Iranian domestically produced version of the Jeep. This version of the Safir is equipped with Tosan 1 wire-guided missile launcher based on the Soviet 9M113 Konkurs.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.0

Faragh 2

Spoiler

fg.png.d2521bef4326a3a96e982223af2d8f3b.

A short range MLRS system, can be equipped with either four 240 mm or two 333 mm rockets.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.3

Raad 2M

Spoiler

7127609547-d264c34dc7-z.jpg.f6928ed16d20

1280px-Holy_Defence_Week_Expo_-_Simorgh_

The Raad 2M is an Iranian domestically-produced version of the M109 SPG, first produced in 1997. It was based on a Soviet T-72 hull with advanced fire control system, fume extractor, and laser rangefinder. The M version is an upgraded version with a more powerful 5TDF engines.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR:8.7

Sayyad (Toophan ATGM)

Spoiler

1512.jpg.b0811c95d232c96aec271a5f344672d

The Sayyad is a compact-sized IFV specifically built for unconventional warfare. The vehicle can be equipped with various weapons, this version is equipped with two 90 mm Toophan 5 ATGM launchers.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.0

 

Line 5: SPAAG line

Spoiler

Sayyad (12.7 mm Moharram)

Spoiler

983.png.52dbc3ea95fec082de5c096ee846377a

This variant of the Sayyad compact IFV features 12.7 mm Moharram rotary cannons as its main armament.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.0

Rakhsh (ZU-23)

Spoiler

n2717060-3907789.jpg.25da3379ac4b301036c

The Rakhsh is one of the first delicated military vehicle ever built by the new Islamic Republic. This version of the Rakhsh is equipped with a pair of 23 mm ZU-23 anti-air cannons.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.3

Seraj Sadej 10

Spoiler

D4qmzaj-WAAEu-WYB.jpg.aef5cf0d950e0e2d15

An SPAA based on the Seraj cruise missile platform. It is equipped with two 35 mm Samavat (a clone of the Oerlikon GDF AA guns) AA guns.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.0

Mesbah 1

Spoiler

ewdnq6gyb1a31.jpg.74eaf6e1088200f10e2829

A truck-based heavy anti-air mount. Equipped with eight 23 mm ZU-23 cannons.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.0

Herz 9

Spoiler

456.png.e14f90e9ce8e9cb96ba8b7ffc67db0c4

A truck-based anti-air system equipped with two Shahab Thaqeb missile launcher (based on the HQ-7)

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 10.3

Ya Zahra

Spoiler

 

21687168-2183390195221374-89369543049976

Originally a static variant of the quadruple Shahab Thaqeb missile launcher, it was later mounted on a heavy truck.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 10.7

Ra'ad 3rd Kordad

Spoiler

47.png.566d32b3efe6bdfdd43f71de9134b9e3.

article-5d0df95061c958-03111659.jpg.6927

A long-range heavy aeriel defense system. Can utilize either the Taer-2B, Taer-2C, or Taer-2IR anti-air misile and is equipped with a search-and-tracking radar.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: 12.0+

 

Line 6: Premium/event vehicles:

Spoiler

Bahman

Spoiler

Bahman-twin-cannon-57mm-anti-aircraft-ai

A heavy truck-based SPAA prototype mounted with a twin 57 mm turret from ZSU-57-2.

 

Rank V Estimated BR: 7.0

Type 69

Spoiler

62779602_159(1).png.0550794c81757c9ad0a2

Basically a copy-paste of the Chinese Type 69. Iran accquired a number of these tank from China as well as captured from Iraq during the war.

 

Rank V BR: 7.3

EE-9 Cascaval

Spoiler

aa.jpg.1ba1d5ddd67e5ce2e47219c37531c1cc.

A Brazilian AFV that were sold and used by Iran during the Iraq-Iran war.

 

Rank VI estimated BR: 8.0

170 mm "Koksan"

Spoiler

042441dd2a720b7ec9ba03997d565b4c.jpg.519

A North Korean super-heavy SPG imported during the Iraq-Iran war. The device is still under the Iranian services.

Rank VI Estimated BR: 8.3

T-72M "Asad Babil"

Spoiler

87.png.d7ea2f144b971ff0f11e2084541b97c9.

During the Iraq-Iran war, Iran manage to capture several Iraqi-made T-72M "Asad Babil" tank. These tanks were initially used by Iran before replaced by the domestically-built T-72S. Althought the tank later served as test bed for further Iranian tank developments.

 

Rank VI Estimated BR: 9.0

Zulfiqar 2

Spoiler

785.png.d5ed1d0ffc1db03263208497907cfb72

An interim design of the Zulfiqar series of MBT, initially designed from a lenghtened Zulfiqar 1 hull.

 

Rank VII Estimated BR: ~10.7

 

 

 

New vehicles added to proposal (April 2023):

 

Spoiler

Tosan (2A42) aka Tosan 30

Spoiler

DSC0719.jpg

Essentially a Tosan IFV re-equipped with a 30 mm 2A42 autocannon from the BMP series.

 

Estimated BR: 8.3

Zoljanah

Spoiler

 

 

bmp2.jpg

 

123.png

An Iranian upgraded version of the BMP-2. Capable of mounting a single 9M133 Kornet launcher.

 

Estimated BR: 8.7 - 9.0

T-72 Rakhsh (early)

Spoiler

33222.jpg

An early version of the T-72 Rakhsh. While the tank has not entered services with the IRGC, it was supplied to the Iraq Popular Mobilisation Forces, who remains the primary user.

 

Estimated BR: 10.0

Banihashem ATV 50

Spoiler

URAJeSu.jpg

nXnwihA.jpg

This is, in my opinion, will probably be the most controversial choice of this proposal. Since this vehicle blurred the line between a proper military vehicle and an improviesed technical.

 

Basically, this is an ATV that can be equipped with either the Toophan (based on BGM-71 TOW) or Dehlaviyeh (based on 9M113 Konkurs) ATGM launcher on the back. It was designed specifically as a cheap mobile anti-tank platform that can be quickly deployed.

 

Estimated BR: 9.0

Majid AD-08

Spoiler

 

552.png

 

bsp_7449-jdw-14607.jpg

A short range anti-air missile system mounted on a light truck. The missile has a maximum range of 8 km.

 

Estimated BR: 10.0

T-72 Khorramshahr

Spoiler

Wr5reDI.jpg

An early upgrade project of the T-72M1 during the 90s. Iran contracted the Ukrainian firm to upgrade the vehicle's mobility and electronices. It was ultimately never entered service.

 

Squadron vehicle. Estimated BR: 9.7

 

 

Visual tech tree (V.3):

 

Spoiler

Untitled144.png.8338277f9ab3a93e94421f06

 

Sources:

 

Spoiler

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_equipment_manufactured_in_Iran

https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2020/01/the-oryx-handbook-of-iranian-fighting.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfiqar_(tank)

https://www.armyrecognition.com/iran_iranian_army_heavy_armoured_main_battle_tank_uk/zulfiqar_3_zolfaqar_main_battle_tank_technical_data_sheet_specifications_description_pictures_video.html

http://tsahal.miniature.pagesperso-orange.fr/zulfiqar3.html (in French)

Cordesman, Anthony H. & Kleiber, Martin (2007). Iran's Military Forces and Warfighting Capabilities: The Threat in the Northern Gulf. Greenwood Publishing Group.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/safir-74.htm

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/Iran/Safir-74.php

http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=606

http://www.armyrecognition.com/february_2013_army_military_defense_industry_news/iranian_army_plans_to_unveil_optimized_version_of_its_home-made_main_battle_tank_zolfaqar_0302132.html

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/iran-unveils-t-72-upgrade

http://www.military-today.com/tanks/sabalan.htm

http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13951222000466

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/tosan.htm

https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=902

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/aqareb.htm

https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_july_2020_global_security_army_industry/iran_irgc_unveils_new_armored_personnel_carriers_and_upgraded_t-72m_main_battle_tank.html

http://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/5562064/انهدام-جنگنده‌های-آمریکایی-با-سامانه-موشکی-سوم-خرداد-تصاویر-و-مشخصات (in Persian)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXrd1V-MKa4 (source for Samavat cannons)

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/tiam.htm

https://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic/1478-iranian-new-mbt-“karrar”‘s-new-tv-show-and-some-detail-i-notice/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karrar_(tank)#/media/File:Iranian_third_generation_tank-Karrar.jpg

http://www.military-today.com/tanks/karrar.htm

http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9202242202

http://www.janes.com/article/37880/irgc-unveils-new-tactical-ballistic-missiles-developments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tondar_(missile)

https://www.magiran.com/article/2687680

https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/825109/عکس-موشک-های-ضد-زره-ایرانی

 

Edited by NotKringe
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 6
  • Confused 4
  • Upvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Suggestion Moderator

I personally don't agree with skipping ranks due to C&P because I think it misses some of the historic value of the tree. That being said I'm totally in favor of Iran having a tree, IMO they deserve one. +1

  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 3
  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, yoyolast said:

I personally don't agree with skipping ranks due to C&P because I think it misses some of the historic value of the tree. That being said I'm totally in favor of Iran having a tree, IMO they deserve one. +1

 

As much as I wanted to add rank IV to fleshing out the tree a bit, the Iranian army prior 1970s doesn't have as much equipments to fill the rank like the Israelis (as they only received modern equipments during mid-70s). So I decided to skip it. Though the more variety of post-1970s vehicle will help filling the gap of the tree.

Edited by NotKringe
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 05/01/2022 at 16:51, EddieVanHalo@live said:

Gajin seems to be struggling to make   Israel work properly . Adding everybody's tech tree is not about making the average players game any more enjoyable .It's just about making money 

What proof do you have of this or are you just making a statement of how you feel?

I'd rather the larger middle eastern tree but this is fine (only if you add a tier 4 to match the isrealis tho).

Edited by hienapunk
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, EddieVanHalo@live said:

But at least Nazi German ,Nazi Italy ,Communist China ,Communist Russia ,Imperial Britain and Imperial Japan existed ,America has its full list of Atrocities and many don't hold favourable views on them  but its a moot point ,they all have a history and existed .This  Arab Iranian  league did not feature Iran then its changed to the Arab league which is a peace council if you read into it. War Thunder replicates Nations not some bizzare semi fictional alliance that never existed . 

Maybe do Turkey ,Iraq, Iran or whatever but what even is the Arab League ? The Current Arab League has nothing to do with the earlier Arab Coalitions as far as I can see either . Some Arab countries agreed with attacking Israel some did not . Iraq and Iran have fought a major conflict against each other during the years of the Arab League .

  

Nobody can ask Gajin to support this proposal in its current state surely ,it's not about politics ,Gajin stays out of that( apart from the pro Stalin slogans on tanks )

Dude, this proposal was about an Iranian-only tree, not an Arab league + Iran tree.

Or perhaps you intended to quote someone else and mistakenly quoted me.

  • Confused 1
medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, EddieVanHalo@live said:

But at least Nazi German ,Nazi Italy ,Communist China ,Communist Russia ,Imperial Britain and Imperial Japan existed ,America has its full list of Atrocities and many don't hold favourable views on them  but its a moot point ,they all have a history and existed .This  Arab Iranian  league did not feature Iran then its changed to the Arab league which is a peace council if you read into it. War Thunder replicates Nations not some bizzare semi fictional alliance that never existed . 

Maybe do Turkey ,Iraq, Iran or whatever but what even is the Arab League ? The Current Arab League has nothing to do with the earlier Arab Coalitions as far as I can see either . Some Arab countries agreed with attacking Israel some did not . Iraq and Iran have fought a major conflict against each other during the years of the Arab League .

  

Nobody can ask Gajin to support this proposal in its current state surely ,it's not about politics ,Gajin stays out of that( apart from the pro Stalin slogans on tanks )

if you look at it in macro size , we have 2 sides of conflict :

a side with Iran trying to influence 

a side with US trying to control with economical power (we can see this with the Tank competition which lead to a abrams being chosen over the leclerc)

the thing is if we want to do arab League thing ,then because you said Iraq had war with iran so they should not be counted friendly , then we can say that Iraq should not be in arab League because it attacked kuwait .( then US attacks and iraqi equipment fly into iran instead of arab hand )

the fictional co-ops are not even considered bad in this game . we have BMP1 and marder at a same TT . we have jokes about russian Migs in german TT , they are many topics open ,begging to get T72s in german TT . 

with this i do not support iran only TT which makes it non existence .

  • Upvote 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Zucc_Boi said:

Dude, this proposal was about an Iranian-only tree, not an Arab league + Iran tree.

Or perhaps you intended to quote someone else and mistakenly quoted me.

I probably didn't make it clear but politically all the Arab states have changed sides and Ideology over the years .We had the Shah who was pro West and The Ayatollah who maybe wasn't so much,  There has been objection to an arab league on WT because people confused them with aggressive coalitions from the past  but Iran were not part of it . Kind of getting self righteous over any army in WT is pointless because war is a dirty business for all and we all have history there . That was my badly made point lol and might even be the point you were actually making.  

53 minutes ago, ACOMETS said:

if you look at it in macro size , we have 2 sides of conflict :

a side with Iran trying to influence 

a side with US trying to control with economical power (we can see this with the Tank competition which lead to a abrams being chosen over the leclerc)

the thing is if we want to do arab League thing ,then because you said Iraq had war with iran so they should not be counted friendly , then we can say that Iraq should not be in arab League because it attacked kuwait .( then US attacks and iraqi equipment fly into iran instead of arab hand )

the fictional co-ops are not even considered bad in this game . we have BMP1 and marder at a same TT . we have jokes about russian Migs in german TT , they are many topics open ,begging to get T72s in german TT . 

with this i do not support iran only TT which makes it non existence .

Again yes ,Im referencing the Ally /Axis or Friendly/ Enemy basis for combat that WT use . How do you make sides out of the middle eastern countries ? Who fights against who or is it all so  mixed now it doesn't matter anymore ? 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, EddieVanHalo@live said:

Again yes ,Im referencing the Ally /Axis or Friendly/ Enemy basis for combat that WT use . How do you make sides out of the middle eastern countries ? Who fights against who or is it all so  mixed now it doesn't matter anymore ? 

i don't know , the thing is because of the saudi arabia being the core of islam and having the makkah being in saudi arabia , there can not be a real wide conflict between iran iraq syria side with saudi arabia .

some countries like UAE are with saudis , because they are still in cultural shock of US . (look at all western fastfood brands) .

unlike the E/W german , this sides are changing over time , we have afghanistan being a change in middle east. it is still happening and we might have some countries change sides.

we have some random attacks to American bases in syria and Iraq passed days weeks and months.

Edited by ACOMETS
  • Like 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ACOMETS said:

i don't know , the thing is because of the saudi arabia being the core of islam and having the makkah being in saudi arabia , there can not be a real wide conflict between iran iraq syria side with saudi arabia .

some countries like UAE are with saudis , because they are still in cultural shock of US . (look at all western fastfood brands) .

unlike the E/W german , this sides are changing over time , we have afghanistan being a change in middle east. it is still happening and we might have some countries change sides.

we have some random attacks to American bases in syria and Iraq passed days weeks and months.

This is the point in many ways .Iran has bought from any and every side it seems . America ,Germany ,UK ,Russia,France  .You would have Chieftains and T series Russian tanks on the same BR . Where would you use them ? How would it work in Sim ,It would exacerbate the chaos we already have in WT. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EddieVanHalo@live said:

This is the point in many ways .Iran has bought from any and every side it seems . America ,Germany ,UK ,Russia,France  .You would have Chieftains and T series Russian tanks on the same BR . Where would you use them ? How would it work in Sim ,It would exacerbate the chaos we already have in WT. 

this is why it should be a moderated TT by not adding everything . with the colab with some arab stuff ,we can have a manageable rank 4 and 5 and with 6 and 7 we get the good stuff . 

medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, EddieVanHalo@live said:

probably didn't make it clear but politically all the Arab states have changed sides and Ideology over the years .We had the Shah who was pro West and The Ayatollah who maybe wasn't so much,

 

Well we already have the germans. They haven't necessarily been ideologically consistent over the years either.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, hienapunk said:

 

Well we already have the germans. They haven't necessarily been ideologically consistent over the years either.

I didn't mention ideology I mentioned sides and the purchasing of vehicles from other nations that are traditional enemies  of each other   

  • Confused 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 08/01/2022 at 17:23, Zucc_Boi said:

-1 from me as well due to C&P even in the proposed high tiers, but we have literally Nazi Germany here as well, and pretty sure most people don't hold favorable views on China. Tanks used by terrorists is something I think is more than tolerable here, because it's just a game about equipment, not politics.

I agree. Game should be apolitical, so as long as its armored vehicles, +1 for me.

 

We already have Israel too, which is hated among certain nations but made it into the game. So why turn this down? It's a suggestion for more diversity in the game, after all.

  • Upvote 1
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
DieJagdente
DieJagdente gave KnightSepehr a warning for this post
Reason: Verbal Warning Only · Points: 0 ·
On 08/01/2022 at 03:23, VonarianTheGreat said:

-1 from me.

Not getting political, but it's not good at all to add such a country to the game, most vehicles fall under IRGC which is well-known for terrorism.

Aaah yes the person that spreads hate against his own country and brothers , Stop the self humilation and get alife 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I love this as a counterweight to Isreal +1.

 

Isreal gives us eastern tanks in a "NATO" country (Tiran) and Iran gives us western tanks in a "WAPACT" country (Samsam).

Edited by hienapunk
  • Like 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...