Jump to content

Panzer IV 88mm Flak 18/36


  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want this in-game?

    • Yes
      149
    • No
      5


I have pictures of the Panzer IV chassis mounting the Flak 41's

ZprwUhx.jpg

sg3EBfo.jpg

e3PL8Ne.jpg

nmzX67a.jpg

  • Upvote 3
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would love to see it as a TD tiered like at 4.3 or 4.7 :D

 

Would be so deadly

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, right up until you try hitting an airplane with a slow-traversing gun with a a 5-second reload.

actually, these Anti Aircraft guns had a good traverse speed (on par with most AA guns IG) and a trained artillery crew could put a shell every 2-3s

medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and shells could be set to explode in the air... Imagine a 88 mm shells exploding 5 meters near your plane... Youre pretty much dead and your plane too.

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and shells could be set to explode in the air... Imagine a 88 mm shells exploding 5 meters near your plane... Youre pretty much dead and your plane too.

That would be sweet. Actual flak!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 looks good , but there are many other widely used german tank destroyers that are not ingame, like the Nashorn, Panzerjäger I and those should be added first.

medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would love to see it as a TD tiered like at 4.3 or 4.7 :D

 

Would be so deadly

 

Actually it'd be on the SPAA tree.  It just happens to have a big enough gun to double as a TD if necessary.

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We must have Glass-cannon vehicle line - Marders, Hornisse, Sturer emil, Dicker max, and this. BUT PLEASE, NOT WAFFENTRAGER E-100!!!111

 

The WT E-100 is not only completely fictional but is in fact trademarked by WG.  There is literally no possibility of it ever being in the game unless somebody REALLY wants to start a legal ****storm, so don't worry about it.

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The WT E-100 is not only completely fictional but is in fact trademarked by WG.  There is literally no possibility of it ever being in the game unless somebody REALLY wants to start a legal ****storm, so don't worry about it.

It's trademarked? What the hell! Guess it's the same thing with the candy crush saga crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do really hope the SPAAG's Damage model gets repaired before more and more powerful AA is added.

 

Currently they bounce and eat shells in a ridiculous manner, it's nearly no risk to go with AA against light/medium tanks as their hits often just won't do damage while you can hose them and disable or kill stuff easily. Only heavy tanks are moderately safe from SPAA spam (except for external modules) - this feels strange.

I hope WT doesn't become Rambo SPAA tournament, yet if the DM gets more reasonable I'm all for adding more vehicles with interesting setups.

  • Upvote 1
medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do really hope the SPAAG's Damage model gets repaired before more and more powerful AA is added.

 

Currently they bounce and eat shells in a ridiculous manner, it's nearly no risk to go with AA against light/medium tanks as their hits often just won't do damage while you can hose them and disable or kill stuff easily. Only heavy tanks are moderately safe from SPAA spam (except for external modules) - this feels strange.

I hope WT doesn't become Rambo SPAA tournament, yet if the DM gets more reasonable I'm all for adding more vehicles with interesting setups.

The struggle is real. I once got pened frontally or from the turret side by a ZSU-37 while I was in my Panther D. It was insane, here is a medium tank (considered a heavy by the Allies) and I get rekt by a SPAA. This ain't right.

 

SPAAs with 37mm and 20mm guns shouldn't be tank hunters. The Panzer 88mm would be alright though since it's dual purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The WT E-100 is not only completely fictional but is in fact trademarked by WG.  There is literally no possibility of it ever being in the game unless somebody REALLY wants to start a legal ****storm, so don't worry about it.

It's trademarked because THEY designed it.

 

 the trademark/patent was on the E-50 Ausf.M (which didn't exist)

 

http://english.gosu-wot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/patent.tank_.e-50m.0.jpg

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/wargaming-patents-e-50m/

 

so in other words the E-100 is still possible and quit spreading around bull floral.

 

the E-100 in WoT is derived from the sketches of others Whom have copy-writes on the designs that prevent them (WG) from patenting.

3BzHTBn.png

Edited by T3MPEST
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 the trademark/patent was on the E-50 Ausf.M (which didn't exist)

 

http://english.gosu-wot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/patent.tank_.e-50m.0.jpg

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/wargaming-patents-e-50m/

 

so in other words the E-100 is still possible and quit spreading around bull floral.

 

the E-100 in WoT is derived from the sketches of others Whom have copy-writes on the designs that prevent them (WG) from patenting.

3BzHTBn.png

 

I'm talking about the WAFFENTRAEGER E-100, which IS their own design (and one that would've in fact been impossible by their own admission because the gun mounting was way too big irl).  Next time, READ my post before you jump the gun and make yourself look bad, got it?

 

Back on the topic of this thread, what BR should this thing have?  Sure it's a flak vehicle with a massive gun, but said gun probably won't be very useful as an AA gun in-game due to the low rate of fire (unless we can set the range at which the shells burst, otherwise a direct hit would be required), so chances are it would be used more frequently as a tank destroyer.  All of that has to be taken into account when deciding what kind of opposition it should face.

Edited by Z3r0_
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...