Aircraft/Loadouts Removal of unrealistic Jet flames

[Sibir-Hansen@psn 176]

And I sayd its fine, have your epinion, but in my opinion its not a minor thing, its a very big deal I want changed..

so here is an idea for you, talk up the stuff you think are important and want changed in the game, and let others talk up the stuff they want in stead of talking it down..

Edited July 19, 2017 by *Sibir-Hansen

[Arin171 205]

+1

[PlRATE 362]

+1

[Alekseyeva 228]

.1

[ILoveRice 150]

Bump. I remember replying to a thread about removing the jet flame in like 2015, and nothing happened, so hopefully this one gets noticed. 

[Guest]

These flames only appears in afterburn no?

[muzzleflash98 1,697]

1 hour ago, MAX94100 said:

These flames only appears in afterburn no?

 

Correct. And as we don't have any aircraft with afterburners it's a pretty odd thing to see.

[NuclearRain7777 601]

Yes!

[The_Lieutenant 886]

The F9F has an afterburner of a sort, as far as I know. It still doesn't merit the jet of hellfire the rest of the time it isn't being used though.

[Ziero1986 50]

+1

 

The heat haze is already there, just have to turn it on it the graphic settings. The only jets that "should" have the flame effect is those with WEP, and that would be ONLY when the WEP is on. For the cool factor.

Edited August 19, 2017 by Ziero1986
added some stuff

[Sibir-Hansen@psn 176]

Still need this.

[Guest]

Try to fly into space.

When you go in space there is no air so No Flames... 

 

[*AceArchangel 908]

I am baffled that this is still present in game... Such a glaring oversight, how is this not fixed, it looks like a cartoon rather than a combat simulator.

[Target1331 3,055]

Setting another +1, because it still continues to annoy me due to the reasons already mentioned.
Another reason that I came across why I want those completely unrealistic flames removed is the fact that they also cause bugs, were the flame texture e.g. on the Ho 229 and Ar 234 cut through the nacelle walls near the exhaust.

 

Best regards,

 

Phil

[Maverick966 1,240]

+1111

[iFigure 325]

I dont have any jets but +1 for realism

[sniperNZSAS 1,116]

+1

 

This thread has been here since 2015 why hasn't this been done yet??

[Maltegra 875]

+1 

[Blafirelli 277]

6 hours ago, sniperNZSAS said:

+1

 

This thread has been here since 2015 why hasn't this been done yet??

Well, it seems graphic design lead cares most about numbers of polygons and texure resolutions, not about the general authenticity :/

[Maverick966 1,240]

++++++111111111111111111111111111111111

[Blafirelli 277]

Not only is this still not implemented, but the suggestion (or should we rather call it a bug report?) hasn't been even moved to "Further discussion" section (for more than 2 years). This makes me sad

[*AceArchangel 908]

6 hours ago, Blafirelli said:

Not only is this still not implemented, but the suggestion (or should we rather call it a bug report?) hasn't been even moved to "Further discussion" section (for more than 2 years). This makes me sad

Exactly it's been two years since this was posted and it just keeps getting forgotten, it needs to be implemented, the flames hurt to look at for me.

[Miki_Hoshii 2,449]

+1

[kev2go 5,112]

yes + 1

 

this has been discussed for ages.

 

Needs to be removed .

 

This would only be present for an afterburning aircraft , but only when engaged in AB mode.  

 

 

[TyphoonCro 6,833]

On 18. 08. 2017. at 6:27 PM, The_Lieutenant said:

The F9F has an afterburner of a sort, as far as I know. It still doesn't merit the jet of hellfire the rest of the time it isn't being used though.

 

Incorrect, F9F never had afterburner

Only Water injection

 

But I still support this idea

Edited October 20, 2017 by TyphoonCro